result image We’re ranked the BEST for one simple reason. We treat our clients fairly, because we CARE.
result image

Recent Results

$5,545,000.00 Wrongful Death / Truck Accident Attorney Fees: $2,180,000 Litigation Expenses: $100,000
result image

Recent Results

$2,500,000.00 Wrongful Death / Workplace Accident Attorney Fees: $833,333 Litigation Expenses: $166,667
result image

Recent Results

$7,500,000.00 Wrongful Death / Truck Accident Attorney Fees: $3,000,000 Litigation Expenses: $320,000
result imageresult image
Michael Headshot

Everything there is to know about car accident cases, all in one place:

Car accident victims are allowed to seek compensation from the person responsible for their accident; everyone knows that. However, most people have a significant misunderstanding of the most basic principles underlying this concept. Or to put it another way, everything that you’ve ever heard non-attorneys say about car accidents and related lawsuits is probably quite inaccurate.

In this article, our attorneys will explain the broad strokes of the relevant laws, and we’ll also link you to other articles which delve into the specifics.

Insurance Carriers Want it to be Confusing

The main reason for this widespread confusion is the advent of the modern insurance claims process. Most everyone believes that an insurance claim filed against the other driver’s insurance carrier is:

  1. a requirement that must be fulfilled, and
  2. that it is a process meant to favor or benefit the injured party.

Essentially everyone bases their understanding of car accident law on those premises, but it should work the other way around. Accident victims should first understand the law, and then that understanding should guide the way that the insurance claim is executed.

The main reason that this misunderstanding is so prevalent is because that’s exactly how the insurance industry wants you to think it works. They put forth great effort to create the illusion that when you’re in an accident, you need only file a claim and everything is taken care of, post haste. The reality is that there is nothing in the law to support this. In fact, the law puts the ball in your court, so you (or your attorney) must know what steps to take if you want to be fairly compensated.

Eight Things You Must Understand About Car Accident Cases

There are eight concepts at work in a car accident claim that must be understood:

  1. There’s No Such Thing as “Car Accident Law” – There is no subsection of the law called “car accident law.” Car accident cases are personal injury cases, so they are based on a combination of:
    • non-codified (codes are written laws drafted by a legislature) concepts inherent in common law,
    • codified injury laws drafted by state legislatures (in Texas, our injury laws are codified in the Civil Practices and Remedies Code),
    • and statutes based in completely different areas of the law, such as insurance law, property law, etc.

    If you don’t understand all of the relevant, overlapping laws, then you’ll never have a complete understanding of how to handle a car accident case. (read more here about this combination of laws that apply in car accidents)

  2. Who’s Who – You, the injured party, are a called a plaintiff. The at-fault party is called a defendant.
  3. You Can Skip The Insurance Claim Altogether – You are not required to file a claim against the defendant’s insurance carrier. The insurance claims process may be, at best, a convenience, or, at worst, a potentially deceptive ruse to lure you away from exercising your rights. But what it’s definitely not is a requirement. You can bypass the process of filing a claim and simply sue the defendant if you so choose.
  4. There are Several Different Types of Insurance Claims (and you should understand the difference) – Claims made against certain types of insurance policies (such as life insurance policies or workers’ compensation policies) are eligibility-based claims. That is to say, you must only prove that you are eligible to make a claim and the insurance carrier must compensate you since you meet the eligibility criteria. On the contrary, claims made against auto insurance policies are liability-based claims. You can only get money from the policy when you convince the insurance carrier that their insured driver was negligent and would therefore be found liable for your injuries if the case went to court. With a liability-based claim, the insurance carrier is allowed to fight back, but that’s not the whole story.
  5. Insurance Carriers Are Actually Required to Fight You – Insurance carriers owe their insured clients a legal obligation to provide a defense. If you sue a driver, their insurance carrier has to provide them with an attorney. Likewise, if you attempt to settle out of court, the insurance adjuster is required to protect their insured from your claim. Their job is to work against you.
  6. Insurance Carriers Only Pay You When They’re Afraid A Jury Will Make Them Pay You Even More – Your case has zero inherent value. Accident victims often make the mistake of assuming that the defendants “owe” them compensation. That is not accurate. What the law states is that accident victims have the right to take the defendant to court, make their arguments against the defendant, and if the jury believes that the defendant acted negligently, then the defendant owes the plaintiff a sum of money. 100% of the value of your case is based on how a judge and jury would rule in the case. Yet it is expensive and time consuming to take every case to trial, so, in most cases, filing an insurance claim is the better option. However, in order for the insurance claim to be successful (read: in order for the insurance carrier to offer you a fair amount), you absolutely must treat the insurance claim as if the case will indeed go to trial. In other words, insurance claims are not designed to work in your favor, but if you understand what makes them tick, then you can use the threat of a court case to gain the upper hand in the claims process.
  7. Treating Your Insurance Claim Like a Trial Case Makes It Valuable. Treating It Like an Insurance Claim Makes it Worthless – If you were taking your case to trial, you would document the injuries and losses sustained, articulate your accusations against the defendant, and preserve and present evidence, all in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure (court and trial rules) and the Rules of Evidence. Likewise, if you treat the insurance claim in the exact same way, you are essentially telling the insurance carrier, “This is precisely how I would present the case to a jury, so you’d better settle with me or I’ll file suit against your insured. As you can see, I’m already prepared.” This gives the insurance carrier a sneak preview of what they’ll face in trial so they will be able to comprehend how a jury would punish their insured. Reread #5 above. Your case has no value other than the value a jury says it has, so if you don’t treat your insurance claim like a trial, then you are announcing to the insurance carrier, “I don’t know what I’m doing, so don’t be afraid of what I can convince a jury to do.” If the insurance carrier isn’t afraid of what you can do it court, they won’t offer you very much. Good cases are often ruined by those with no legal experience doing a poor job of explaining why exactly their case is good. What makes a lawyer good at his job is knowing how to tell his client’s story in a way that is both compelling and in accordance with the stringent guidelines present in a court case.
  8. Court Rules and Decorum Matter – Cases are lost every single day by people who don’t understand the rules of court. When to file, how to answer discovery, what you can and can’t say are all things that you (or your attorney) should know. Once you accidentally illustrate to an insurance adjuster that you don’t understand these things, they are not afraid of you any more. Further, once the statute of limitations has expired, you have no case at all. In #5, we mentioned that your car accident claim has no value other than what a jury says it’s worth. So if you miss the statute of limitations deadline, you can no longer take your case to trial to find out what a jury says it’s worth, ergo, your claim has no value. About once a week, our firm is contacted by an accident victim who had a good case, but they let the statute of limitations run or they tried to handle a case on their own and their case was thrown out because they violation some court procedure that they didn’t know existed in the first place. When that happens, you’re completely out of luck.

Further Reading

Now that you know the basics, here are some more informative articles that will help you delve into the specifics. For a list of frequently asked questions, read our FAQ page.

In Order to Win a Car Accident Case:

  1. You must prove the defendant driver’s negligence. Car accident cases are predicated upon proving the defendant’s liability. That liability is established by showing the driver’s conduct constitutes either some type of ordinary negligence, negligence per se, or gross negligence.

    OR

    Prove some other defendant’s negligence. Some car accident cases are not entirely (or are not at all) the fault of the driver of the other car. Sometimes a third party other than the driver is responsible.

    The way you prove a defendant’s liability is by offering evidence that shows their negligence. This is another area of the law where “conventional wisdom” is totally wrong. Most people think that all you have to do is get your hands on a police report that says who is at fault and that will be your golden ticket. This is wrong for a variety of reasons. First, police officers are not kings. Their proclamations are opinions, not irrefutable facts (being that we live in America). As such, police reports are subject to being picked apart by the defendants. Further, police reports are often erroneous. Lastly, as a matter of court procedure, police reports are not inherently admissible in court. Because of this fact, you have to take proactive steps to “prove up” the police report in order for it to even be allowed in court. If you fail to do this (or if you don’t know how to do so) then the judge won’t allow the police report to be shown to the jury. A local Dallas attorney who we’ve known for years flat-out lost a case because he forgot to “prove up” the police officer as a qualified expert prior to trial. So, on the day of trial, the police officer was not allowed by the court to offer any opinions about the accident, which, of course, meant that he wasn’t allowed to show the jury his police report. Had the jury been allowed to see the police report, they would have known that the officer placed the defendant 100% at fault. But since they couldn’t see this, they drew their own conclusions, and our attorney friend lost a case that should have been winnable.

    So if the police report is not all it’s claimed to be, how then is fault determined and proven in a car accident case? The answer is that a thorough investigation must occur, which will produce various types of evidence. That evidence combined with witness testimony, deposition testimony, and, yes, even the police report will be used to tell your side of the story. It takes a broad spectrum of evidence to prove a case.

  2. You must prove the extent of your injuries and other losses. Your losses, in their many forms, are legally called “damages.” While there are many types of damages that you can demand the defendant to compensate you for, you must understand that the burden is on you, the plaintiff, to prove your damages to the court. If you can’t prove that you sustained, say, lost wages, for example, then the jury will have no reason to make the defendant pay you for lost wages. In very rare circumstances, some states allow claims for what we call “scheduled damages.” Scheduled damages are losses that have a predetermined value. For example, a broken finger is worth $1,000, an amputated leg is worth $300,000, a burn injury is worth $50,000. Fortunately, our state’s personal injury laws don’t work that way. Rather than assign an arbitrary amount to injuries, Texas law, Arkansas law, and New York law (the states we regularly practice in) all allow the jury to listen to the particular facts of a case and then determine how much the injury is worth to the victim in question, which makes good sense. Obviously, a broken finger is much more costly to a surgeon than to a school teacher. While they are both deserving of compensation for a broken finger caused by the negligence of another, surely a one-size-fits all amount of compensation is not equally fair. Again, though, the victim must explain to the jury what their injuries are worth or the jury will not know what to make the defendant pay.
  3. If necessary, you’ll have to go the distance by filing suit and trying the case. All of the above holds true whether your car accident resulted in a life-changing, catastrophic injury or a temporary inconvenience. But once it becomes necessary to file suit, all of the above (proving negligence, proving the extent of your injuries, contemplating how a jury would view the evidence presented) suddenly become very formal. It should certainly be said that litigating (litigation is the act of pursuing a case through court rather than out of court) a case adds a degree of risk to the equation. Suddenly you’ll have to consider factors such as:
    • Will a judge allow all of your evidence into court?
    • Will the law change will your case is pending (it has happened)?
    • Will the jurors that show up for jury duty that day be fair or will you get dealt a bad hand?

    These factors should not scare you away from litigation, but before the decision to litigate a case is made, you must at least understand and appreciate said factors. Further, you should also know how trying a case works.

Special Situations:

There are some car accident scenarios that should be treated as “special situations.” This means that the normal game plan needs to be modified or that there is some added complexity in the case that needs to be understood and addressed.

Of Course, The Defendants Will Fight Back:

The defendant who caused your accident has the right to defend himself (that’s obviously where the term “defendant” comes from). Just the same way that there are certain “off-the-shelf” theories of liability or types of negligence that you can assert against the defendant, he or she will be able to assert certain court-recognized defenses against you. It’s important that you understand some of these defenses.

All About Insurance:

Most of the money to compensate personal injury victims is collected from insurance policies owned by the defendant who caused the accident. Therefore, insurance policies, claims made against them, and the adjusters who administer the policies should be understood.

Putting It All Together:

Now that you have a good idea as to how it all works, here is an article that vividly describes how all of the above factors apply to several specific examples:

Additional Info:

Here are some additional articles that address car accident-related issues:

Do you have a legal question? Enter your phone number in the boxes below and we will call you immediately.
- -
Call us anytime toll Free 1-855-326-0000
Attorney Michael Grossman is here to help. Get In Touch. Attorney Michael Grossman is here to help. I'm here to help.
Do you have a legal question? Enter your phone number in the boxes below and we will call you immediately.
- -
Call us anytime toll Free 1-855-326-0000