Altamonte Springs, FL — October 29, 2025, two people were injured in a truck accident at about 2 a.m. on West State Road 436.
Authorities said a semi-truck was trying to make a U-turn near State Road 434 when a car crashed into the side of its trailer, becoming wedged underneath it.

Two people were hospitalized after being extricated from the vehicle, according to authorities. One of them was in critical condition.
No other injuries were reported.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Seminole County crash at this time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When people hear that a car ended up wedged underneath a semi-trailer, their first question is usually, “How does something like that even happen?” That’s a fair question, and one that deserves real answers. Based on what’s been reported so far, we know a semi-truck was making a U-turn around 2 a.m., and a car crashed into the side of its trailer. What we don’t know is what led to that moment, and whether the crash was the result of a bad decision, a preventable hazard or something else entirely.
Right now, it’s not clear whether the truck was already across the road when the car hit it, or if it was still in the process of turning. That makes a big difference. If the trailer was stretched across multiple lanes of a dark roadway, it may have presented an unavoidable obstacle to approaching drivers, especially if it lacked proper lighting or reflective markings.
And that raises a few more questions. Was the trailer legally allowed to be turning there? Were its lights and reflective tape in good working order? Did the truck have side underride guards that might have prevented the car from going underneath? These aren’t idle details. They’re critical to determining whether the crash was avoidable.
Beyond the physical evidence at the scene, there’s also the issue of timing and visibility. A crash at 2 a.m. means low light conditions. That makes it even more important for large vehicles to be highly visible and predictable in their movements. If the driver misjudged the speed of oncoming traffic or took too long to complete the turn, that could indicate poor training or decision-making.
This is where the evidence comes in. The truck’s engine control module (ECM) may show whether the vehicle was accelerating or stopped at the moment of impact. In-cab cameras, if installed, could offer a driver’s-eye view. And cell phone records might reveal whether the driver was distracted. I’ve handled plenty of cases where this kind of information completely changed the narrative of what people initially thought happened.
There’s also a bigger question about the company that put this driver on the road. What kind of training did they provide? Did they have policies for nighttime U-turns on public highways? Did anyone even check to see if this was a safe spot to turn a 70-foot vehicle?
All of that takes an independent investigation, one focused not just on blame, but on facts. Until that happens, there’s a lot we don’t know, and no one should be jumping to conclusions.
Key Takeaways:
- It’s unclear whether the truck was stopped or moving when the car crashed into the trailer.
- The visibility of the trailer, especially at 2 a.m., is a critical factor that needs to be investigated.
- Black box data, in-cab cameras and cell phone records can help establish what the truck driver was doing at the time.
- The trucking company’s training and routing policies may be just as relevant as the driver’s actions.
- Determining who’s responsible requires more than surface-level reporting. It takes real evidence.