Greene County, MO — July 14, 2025, a man was injured due to a truck accident sometime in the morning along Highway MM (North Brookline Avenue).
According to authorities, a man was traveling in a southbound passenger car on State Highway MM in the vicinity of the Sawyer Road intersection when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, the passenger vehicle allegedly veered left of center and entered the oncoming lane of traffic. There it was apparently involved in a collision with a northbound 18-wheeler.
The man reportedly sustained injuries of unknown severity, though they were described as to have been non-life-threatening. He was transported to a local medical facility by EMS in order to receive necessary treatment.
Additional details pertaining to this incident—including the identity of the victim—are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a passenger car crosses into oncoming traffic and hits an 18-wheeler head-on, most people assume it’s an open-and-shut case. But legally, the key question isn’t just who crossed the line—it’s why did that happen, and could either driver have done anything to avoid the collision?
At this stage, reports suggest the passenger vehicle veered left of center. But that still leaves unanswered questions about what caused that movement. Was it driver inattention? Fatigue? A mechanical issue? Or something in the roadway that forced an evasive maneuver? Any of those could change how responsibility is assessed. Investigators will need to look at steering components, tire integrity, phone records, and even the roadway itself to rule out possible contributing factors.
From the truck driver’s side, there’s also the question of situational awareness and speed. On a two-lane road like Highway MM, where visibility is generally clear, the truck operator might have had a few seconds to react—but whether that was enough time to take meaningful evasive action depends entirely on speed, distance, and driver attentiveness. In cases I’ve worked, we’ve seen situations where just a few feet of lateral movement or deceleration made the difference between a collision and a close call.
Scene evidence like skid marks, final vehicle positions, and impact angles will be critical here. If the car only partially crossed the line, or if the truck was already close to the centerline, that could influence how fault is ultimately shared.
Even when injuries are non-life-threatening, the root causes still matter. That’s especially true when a large commercial vehicle is involved—because the margin for error is much smaller when one of the vehicles weighs 40 tons.
Key Takeaways
- The investigation must determine why the passenger vehicle veered into oncoming traffic—whether due to driver behavior, mechanical failure, or road conditions.
- Scene evidence such as tire marks and impact angles will help clarify how far the vehicle crossed and whether the truck had time to respond.
- The truck driver’s speed and positioning are relevant, especially on a two-lane road where reaction time is limited.
- Vehicle inspections and phone records will help identify whether distraction or equipment issues played a role in the initial lane departure.
- Determining responsibility requires a full reconstruction—not just of where the vehicles ended up, but of how and why they got there.