Tarrant County, TX — May 30, 2024, Tommy Nguyen and another person were injured in a car accident at approximately 11:45 a.m. along State Highway 183.

According to authorities, 29-year-old Tommy Nguyen was traveling in a westbound Acura TLX on S.H. 183 in the vicinity west of Haltom Road when the accident took place.

Road conditions in the area were apparently wet at the time of the wreck. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, an eastbound Nissan Titan pickup truck occupied by a 20-year-old man failed to safely maintain control on the wet roads. It consequently swerved left, crossing over the center turn lane and entering the oncoming lane of the highway. There, a T-bone collision occurred between the right side of the pickup truck and the front-end of the Acura.

Both Nguyen and the man from the pickup truck reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident. EMS transported each of them to area medical facilities so that they could receive necessary treatment.

Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a vehicle slides out of control and crosses into oncoming traffic, especially in wet conditions, the immediate assumption tends to be driver error. But in cases like this, where serious injuries result, it’s worth asking whether that’s the full story—or if something else went wrong that made the crash unavoidable.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
A vehicle swerving across multiple lanes and into oncoming traffic should raise red flags about how the crash happened—not just where it ended. Did investigators evaluate the vehicle’s path, braking marks (if any), and lane positioning before the impact? Were they able to determine whether the driver attempted corrective action or whether the loss of control was abrupt and total? Wet roads complicate things, but they don’t excuse a shallow investigation.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
Blaming wet pavement is common, but it can overshadow more concerning possibilities like tire failure, compromised suspension, or a malfunctioning anti-lock braking system. If the Nissan Titan had any of these issues, it might not have mattered how carefully the driver was operating the vehicle. Unless the pickup underwent a post-crash mechanical inspection, no one can say with certainty that weather alone was the problem.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Modern vehicles like the Titan and the Acura are often equipped with data recorders that log speed, braking, and steering behavior in the moments before impact. That data could show whether the pickup was driving too fast for conditions or if a sudden loss of traction occurred despite reasonable input. It could also confirm whether the Acura driver had any time to react. If that information hasn’t been pulled, a critical layer of clarity may be missing.

When a crash ends in the opposing lane with both drivers seriously hurt, it’s not enough to point to road conditions. Real answers come from examining the vehicles, the data, and the chain of events—not from assumptions.

  • Cross-lane crashes should prompt reconstruction of vehicle behavior before and during the incident.
  • Tire and brake system failures must be ruled out before attributing blame to wet roads alone.
  • Onboard data can verify whether the loss of control was due to speed, error, or something mechanical.

Explore cases we take