Bexar County, TX — January 1, 2025, two teens were injured in a car accident at approximately 1:00 a.m. along Westfall Avenue.
According to authorities, three people—a 24-year-old, a 17-year-old boy, and a 14-year-old boy—were traveling in a westbound Nissan Versa at the New Braunfels Avenue intersection when the accident took place.
Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, the Nissan entered the intersection at an apparently unsafe time, failing to yield the right-of-way at a stop sign. This resulted in a collision between front-end of the Nissan and the front-right quarter of a northbound GMC Yukon.
The two teen boys from the Nissan reportedly sustained serious injuries as a result of the collision. Additional details pertaining to this incident—including the identities of the victims—are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
Crashes involving young passengers—especially teenagers—raise serious questions that demand more than surface-level answers. In this case from Bexar County, where two teens were reportedly seriously injured in a collision at a stop-controlled intersection, it’s tempting to zero in on the alleged failure to yield. But in my experience, cases like this are rarely so simple. To understand what really happened and ensure that those affected receive a full and fair accounting, we have to begin with three critical questions.
First, was the crash thoroughly investigated by authorities? Alleging a failure to yield at a stop sign is a start, but it doesn’t explain why the Nissan entered the intersection. Was the stop sign clearly visible and properly placed? Were there obstructions, confusing sightlines, or lighting issues that could have impaired the driver’s judgment? Did the GMC Yukon approach at a speed that gave the driver no reasonable opportunity to avoid the crash? These details often go overlooked unless investigators take the time to fully document the scene, pull surveillance footage if available, and evaluate the intersection’s traffic flow and visibility.
Second, has anyone considered whether a vehicle defect may have contributed to the crash? If the Nissan Versa had a brake system malfunction or delay in throttle response, the driver might have believed they were stopping only to find the vehicle behaving otherwise. Likewise, if the GMC’s safety features didn’t engage properly—such as automatic braking or collision mitigation systems—that might have affected the severity of the impact. These issues can’t be evaluated without a detailed forensic inspection of both vehicles, and that inspection must happen before repairs or scrapping erase potential evidence.
Third, has all available electronic data been preserved and reviewed? The Nissan Versa and GMC Yukon likely contain event data recorders that store vital pre-crash information—speed, braking, throttle input, and steering angle. This data can help reconstruct each vehicle’s behavior leading up to the crash and provide clarity on whether either driver had an opportunity to avoid the collision. Investigators should also explore whether there are nearby surveillance cameras, dashcams, or GPS and cell phone data that could help verify the sequence of events.
Answering these three questions is critical to making sure that no stone is left unturned in understanding the causes of a crash like this. Serious wrecks deserve serious investigation, not assumptions. Getting clear answers to these questions is crucial for those seeking to understand what happened and why—and it’s the least that can be done to help those affected find the clarity and closure they deserve.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us