UPDATE (July 7, 2025): Authorities released further information about the accident. Their statements say that the victim killed in the crash was Seung Hyun “Stanley” Chun. Stanley Chun was a passenger in a Tesla along with Chi Ying Sun, Maria Yen Chun, and an unidentified driver. Chi Sun and Maria Chun were both injured.
The other driver, who was in a Volkswagen Tiguan, allegedly was under the influence of alcohol, which reportedly led to the crash. Authorities recommended that driver be charged for intoxication manslaughter and intoxication assault. Right now, no further information can be confirmed.
Travis County, TX — June 14, 2025, one person was killed and three were injured following a car accident at around 9:00 p.m. on Farm-to-Market 2769.
According to preliminary statements from officials, the crash happened just off the FM 2769 and Anderson Mill Road intersection.
The factors surrounding the accident are not clear right now. Authorities say a car crash left people trapped along FM 2769. One of the victims involved reportedly died. One person was taken from the scene with serious injuries while two others were taken for reportedly minor injuries.
At this time, no further information about the crash can be confirmed.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
With new details coming out and clarifying that authorities believe this all was the result of alleged drunk driving, that raises huge red flags. It’s important continued investigations don’t simply end at the alleged drunk driver and instead extend to where the alcohol actually came from. Here’s why that’s important.
If the allegations are accurate, and the driver of the Volkswagen Tiguan was impaired, then a deeper question arises: Was that person over-served by an alcohol provider while they were already obviously intoxicated? Under Texas dram shop law, the answer matters. Bars, restaurants, and other alcohol-serving establishments are prohibited from continuing to serve patrons who show signs of obvious intoxication. That responsibility isn’t about hindsight—it’s about public safety.
In situations like this, law enforcement focuses on the crash scene and the criminal side of the incident. But they rarely investigate the role an alcohol provider may have played unless someone steps forward to push for that line of inquiry. That means a critical contributor to the danger—if one exists—may remain in the background.
The charges being recommended are serious, and they should be. But when lives are lost and alcohol is suspected, accountability may extend beyond the alleged drunk driver alone. The law exists not just to punish after the fact, but to prevent harm when prevention is still possible.
Three key takeaways:
- Texas law prohibits alcohol providers from over-serving patrons who are obviously intoxicated, especially when public safety is at stake.
- In fatal crashes involving alleged impairment, the actions of alcohol providers are rarely investigated unless someone asks the right questions.
- Full accountability sometimes starts long before a crash—at the point where someone chose to serve one drink too many.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us