Alcoa, TN — August 26, 2025, Rowland Buck was killed due to a bicycle versus truck accident shortly before 8:00 a.m. along East Hunt Road.
According to authorities, 61-year-old Rowland Buck was traveling on a bicycle on East Hunt Road in the vicinity of the North Wright Road intersection when the accident took place.
Information surrounding this accident remains scarce. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a collision occurred between the bicycle and an 18-wheeler that had also been traveling on Hunt Road. Buck reportedly sustained critical injuries over the course of the accident; he was transported to a local medical facility by EMS in order to receive immediate treatment. However, he was ultimately unable to overcome the severity of his injuries, having later been declared deceased. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a collision occurs between a bicycle and an 18-wheeler on a local roadway, the most important question is: How did the truck and the cyclist come into conflict on the same stretch of road? Without that answer, we can’t know whether this was an avoidable crash or simply an unfortunate meeting of circumstances.
The reports so far confirm only that both the truck and the cyclist were traveling along East Hunt Road. But that leaves major questions unanswered. Was the truck passing the cyclist from behind? Were both approaching the same intersection from different directions? Did the truck attempt a turn across the cyclist’s path? Each possibility points to a different set of responsibilities and potential failures.
One critical issue in bicycle-truck crashes is visibility. Large commercial trucks have extensive blind spots—particularly along the passenger side and directly in front of the cab. That doesn’t excuse a driver from responsibility, but it does mean investigators need to determine whether the cyclist was reasonably visible and whether the truck driver checked those blind spots before maneuvering.
Evidence is the only way to get clarity. The truck’s ECM (engine control module) can show its speed and braking at the time of the crash. Dash cameras or in-cab monitoring, if present, may show whether the cyclist was visible. Nearby surveillance cameras or witness accounts can fill in gaps about positioning on the roadway. Even the post-crash location of the bicycle and any impact marks on the truck can help reconstruct the sequence of events.
It’s also worth asking what role the trucking company played. Did it train its drivers about operating around cyclists and other vulnerable road users? Were there policies in place to minimize truck traffic on narrower community roads during busy hours? These background details don’t usually make it into the initial police reports, but they can prove decisive in establishing accountability.
Right now, the cause of this collision is not clear. But what’s certain is that only a thorough investigation—beyond what’s in the early news reports—will answer the questions that matter most: What exactly happened, and who is responsible?
Key Takeaways:
- Reports confirm both the truck and bicycle were traveling on Hunt Road, but it’s not clear whether the truck was overtaking, turning, or approaching the cyclist from another angle.
- Truck blind spots make visibility a central issue, especially if the truck was maneuvering near an intersection.
- ECM data, dash cams, and witness statements are crucial for reconstructing the crash.
- The trucking company’s training and safety practices may play a role in determining responsibility.
- Without more evidence, assigning blame is premature—but asking the right questions now ensures accountability later.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us