Bexar County, TX — November 4, 2024, Roland Trevino Martinez was injured in a single-car accident shortly after 2:45 a.m. along Interstate Highway 35.
According to authorities, 50-year-old Roland Trevino Martinez was traveling in a southwest bound Ford Festiva on Interstate Highway 35 in the vicinity of I.H. 410 when the accident took place.
The cause of the accident remains unclear. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, the Festiva was involved in a single vehicle collision. Details surrounding the accident remain scarce. Reports state that Trevino Martinez sustained serious injuries over the course of the wreck. Additional information is not currently available. The investigation continues.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I read about a crash like the one that left Roland Trevino Martinez seriously injured, I know that many people will assume it was simply a case of driver error. While that’s certainly a possibility, my experience has shown me that single-vehicle crashes—especially those occurring on highways—are often more complex than they first appear. Instead of making assumptions, it’s important to ask the right questions to ensure that all possible contributing factors are explored. To that end, there are three critical questions that need to be considered.
First, did the authorities conduct a thorough investigation? When a vehicle is involved in a single-car crash, investigators should determine whether external factors played a role. Did law enforcement examine the roadway for hazards such as debris, poor lighting, or uneven pavement? Did they collect statements from any available witnesses or check for indications that another vehicle’s actions contributed to the crash? The quality of the investigation will determine whether all possible explanations are explored or if key details are overlooked.
Second, has anyone looked into whether a vehicle defect contributed to the crash? While single-vehicle accidents are often attributed to driver error, mechanical failures—such as brake malfunctions, steering issues, or tire failures—should not be ruled out. If the driver attempted to take corrective action but the vehicle didn’t respond properly, that could be a critical factor in understanding how the crash occurred. Additionally, some vehicles are more prone to stability issues or handling failures, which can contribute to loss of control. Unfortunately, vehicle defects are rarely examined unless someone specifically requests a forensic inspection. If the vehicle is quickly repaired or scrapped, any evidence of a defect may be lost before it can be analyzed.
Lastly, have investigators gathered all available electronic data? Most modern vehicles are equipped with event data recorders (EDRs), which capture crucial details such as speed, braking, and steering inputs in the moments leading up to a crash. This data could help clarify whether the driver attempted to correct the vehicle’s path or if a mechanical failure was involved. Additionally, if any nearby businesses or traffic cameras recorded the crash, that footage could provide valuable context. If this evidence isn’t secured quickly, it may become unavailable, making it harder to determine the full circumstances of the accident.
At the end of the day, answering these questions could be essential to understanding what really happened and why. A thorough examination of all three of these issues—including the quality of police investigations, possible vehicle defects, and electronic data—is the least that can be done to ensure that those affected by the crash receive the clarity they deserve.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us