El Paso, TX — November 2, 2024, Richard Uribes was injured as the result of a car accident that happened around 10:55 p.m. on Loop 375.
According to initial details about the accident, it happened in the area of Loop 375 and Fonseca Drive.

Investigators said that 39-year-old Richard Uribes was in a Ford F-150 going eastbound along the highway when the vehicle somehow left its lane. It veered into the median and crashed, following which a westbound vehicle crashed into debris.
Due to the accident, Uribes was seriously injured. There were no other confirmed injuries. Right now, the cause of the accident remains unconfirmed.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
With the chaos of this crash spanning both directions of travel, it’s even more important to know if authorities were able to keep all the facts straight. It would surprise people how often details can slip through the cracks, leaving victims to look for their own answers and a way to tell their side of the story. In my experience, a few key questions can help in this process.
The first question is whether investigators had the time, tools, and expertise to conduct a comprehensive investigation. A vehicle veering into a median could result from road conditions, visibility issues, or even a driver’s evasive maneuver. Did authorities carefully document the scene, including tire marks, debris, and the condition of the roadway? Were environmental factors, such as lighting or weather, evaluated? Without the time and tools needed, authorities can easily miss something important.
Second is whether a vehicle defect might have contributed to the crash. Mechanical failures, such as issues with brakes, steering, or tires, could cause a driver to lose control. Additionally, safety systems, like seatbelts or airbags, may not have functioned properly, exacerbating injuries. Identifying and addressing potential defects requires a forensic examination of the vehicle—something that standard investigations might not cover, especially if they’re not careful with the vehicles to preserve them for analysis.
Lastly, was all electronic evidence preserved and reviewed? Modern vehicles are equipped with Engine Control Modules (ECMs) that store critical data about speed, braking, and steering inputs in the moments leading up to the crash. Additional evidence, such as cellphone activity, GPS logs, or nearby surveillance footage, can also provide valuable insights into what happened. Acting quickly to secure this evidence is essential to ensure nothing is lost.
When presented with these questions, authorities may be able to prove they’ve been thorough and have a clear understanding of the events. sometimes, though, it becomes clear their efforts have come up short, and there needs to be an independent investigation to make sure nothing important slipped through the cracks. What kind of answers might come up here remains to be seen.