Bulverde, TX — November 7, 2025, Randy McFarlane was injured in a car accident at about 2:15 p.m. on U.S. Route 281.
A preliminary accident report indicates that a northbound 2021 Toyota Corolla and a southbound 2025 Nissan Rogue near Melody Hills.
Toyota driver Randy McFarlane, 63, was seriously injured in the crash, according to the report.
The Nissan driver suffered minor injuries, the report states.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Comal County crash at this time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
After serious crashes, there’s often a rush to assign blame or move on, but the truth usually lies in what isn’t immediately obvious. Even in broad daylight, even on familiar roads, there are countless variables that can lead to a collision. That’s why it’s important to make sure nothing gets overlooked in the aftermath.
Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? When two vehicles collide head-on, it raises obvious questions about what led them into each other’s path. Ideally, investigators would have fully reconstructed the scene, including examining tire marks, vehicle resting positions and point of impact. These details matter, especially when determining which vehicle may have crossed into oncoming traffic, or if one was reacting to a sudden, unexpected obstacle. But not every crash gets the benefit of in-depth analysis. Some officers may rely on visual assessments and driver statements alone, which can miss key facts.
Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? Modern vehicles are packed with systems meant to keep drivers in their lane and warn of impending collisions. If one of these systems failed — or worse, gave false information — it could have caused or worsened the crash. A full mechanical review of both vehicles is essential, especially if there’s any indication that one of the cars drifted or veered without clear reason. Without checking steering components, brakes or driver-assist systems, it’s hard to rule out whether technology did its job or quietly failed.
Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Both vehicles involved are recent models, likely equipped with engine control modules and advanced telemetry. That data could clarify whether either driver braked, swerved or accelerated just before impact. It could also shed light on speed and steering input. If phones were in use or navigation systems were active, that’s another layer of information that can help clarify whether distraction or route confusion played a role. Without pulling and analyzing this data, too much of the story gets left to guesswork.
It’s tempting to take an accident report at face value, especially when one driver is more seriously hurt. But the physical damage rarely tells the full story on its own. Getting answers that actually hold up requires asking the right questions early, and demanding follow-through when things don’t add up.
Key Takeaways:
- A head-on crash deserves more than a surface-level investigation to understand how it truly unfolded.
- Vehicle defects or safety system failures should be considered, especially in newer cars.
- Electronic data from the crash can fill in critical blanks if it’s gathered and reviewed promptly.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us