El Paso, TX — August 2, 2024, a pedestrian was injured in a car accident at about 10:20 p.m. on westbound Interstate 10.

A preliminary accident report indicates that a 2017 Hyundai Sonata hit a pedestrian who was trying to cross the interstate near mile marker 18.

The pedestrian, a 19-year-old man, was seriously injured in the crash, according to the report. His name has not been made public.

The Hyundai driver was not injured, the report states.

The report does not include any additional information about the El Paso County crash.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When serious injuries happen on the roadway, especially in cases involving pedestrians, there’s often a rush to place blame on the individual most visibly out of place. But injury crashes are rarely as simple as they seem at first glance. It’s worth asking what kind of investigation followed, whether vehicle issues played a role, and what digital records might help tell the full story.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? When a pedestrian is struck on a highway, many assume the facts are obvious. But that kind of thinking can short-circuit a real investigation. What matters is whether officials took time to reconstruct exactly how the incident happened. Did they analyze the vehicle’s trajectory and speed? Did they look into what the driver was doing before the impact? Too often, crash responses depend on the experience of the investigating officer: some bring years of advanced reconstruction training, while others may not look past surface-level details.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? A collision like this raises questions about how the car responded in those final moments. Were the brakes working properly? Did any sensor systems alert the driver to someone ahead? Sometimes a car’s systems fail silently, and unless someone inspects the vehicle, those problems never come to light. With a 2017 model, it’s not unreasonable to wonder whether aging parts or overlooked recalls played a role.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Today’s cars often carry a wealth of information that could clarify what happened: how fast the driver was going, when (or if) they hit the brakes and whether any crash avoidance systems activated. Phones, GPS logs or traffic cameras nearby may also hold clues about the moments before impact. If that data hasn’t been secured and reviewed, critical facts might slip away.

As with many pedestrian crashes, the picture painted early on can be incomplete or even misleading. The key is asking the right questions before time or assumptions erase the truth.

Key Takeaways:

  • Serious crash investigations need more than just surface-level reviews.
  • Mechanical failures in vehicles can be hidden unless someone goes looking.
  • Digital records often tell a clearer story than memory or guesses.

Explore cases we take