El Paso, TX — June 15, 2025, a New Mexico woman and two others were injured after an alleged drunk driver accident at 2:06 a.m. along US 54 Business.
According to initial details about the accident, it happened at the intersection of US 54-BUS and State Line Drive at the New Mexico state line.

Investigators said that a 30-year-old Chaparral, New Mexico, woman and two others were in a Nissan Altima going northbound on the highway. A Lexus was also going northbound. The Lexus driver was allegedly under the influence of alcohol at the time when they crashed into the Nissan.
As a result of the accident, the New Mexico woman and one of her passengers had non-serious injuries. The other passenger was seriously injured, authorities said. Right now, it’s unclear if charges have been filed.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When we hear about a late-night crash and early reports suggest alcohol may have been involved, it’s natural to focus on the collision itself. But in situations like this, where multiple people were injured and one was reportedly seriously hurt, the real question becomes: Where did this begin?
If the driver of the Lexus was indeed under the influence at the time of the crash, it raises a familiar but often overlooked issue—how did they become intoxicated, and was someone else in a position to stop it? Under Texas law, alcohol providers are not allowed to continue serving someone who is obviously intoxicated. That’s not just a guideline; it’s a legal safeguard meant to prevent exactly the kind of harm that occurred here.
But this kind of accountability isn’t always part of the initial response. Crash investigations typically prioritize immediate factors—speed, impairment, injuries. They don’t always extend to the events leading up to the crash, like where the drinking happened or who might have noticed warning signs. And unless someone actively pushes for those questions to be asked, the answers may never come to light.
If alcohol did contribute to this incident, that’s precisely the kind of gap dram shop law is meant to fill. It offers a path to explore whether a provider saw the signs and over-served anyway—and whether that choice put other people in danger.
Three key takeaways:
- Texas law bars alcohol providers from serving someone who is obviously intoxicated.
- Initial crash investigations may not explore how an impaired driver got that way—but that doesn’t mean it’s not relevant.
- Dram shop law exists to hold providers accountable when over-service leads to harm.