UPDATE (January 6, 2026): Recent reports have been released which identify the woman who was killed due to this accident as 32-year-old NeShirra Stewart. No additional details are currently available. The investigation remains ongoing.

Travis County, TX — December 20, 2025, a woman lost her life due to a car versus tow truck accident shortly after 3:30 a.m. along East U.S. Highway 290.

According to authorities, two people—a 32-year-old man, and a woman—were traveling in a westbound SUV in the 8400 block of East U.S. 290 when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for reasons yet to be confirmed, a collision took place between the SUV and a tow truck. The woman who had been a passenger in the SUV reportedly sustained fatal injuries due to the wreck and was declared deceased at the scene.

Additional details pertaining to this incident—including the identity of the victim—are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a crash involves a tow truck and results in a fatality, especially in the early morning hours, investigators have to account for a number of risk factors—visibility, lighting, road conditions, and driver alertness among them. But the core legal question remains: Which vehicle had the right to be where it was, and was that right exercised safely?

At 3:30 a.m., most roads have lower traffic volume, but also lower visibility and reduced reaction times—particularly for drivers who may be tired or impaired. If the tow truck was actively engaged in roadside work or merging into traffic, it should have been operating with flashing lights or proper signals. Tow trucks, by nature of their role, often make unexpected stops or occupy partial lanes, so there’s a heightened duty to be visible and predictable.

On the other hand, if the SUV left its lane or failed to recognize a stopped or slow-moving tow truck, that could shift responsibility depending on the evidence. But either way, this isn’t about abstract fault—it’s about whether a foreseeable hazard was properly managed, and whether a life could have been saved through better decisions in those few critical moments.

In past cases I’ve handled involving tow trucks, it’s often a failure of communication between vehicles—either through missing lights, abrupt movements, or poor placement in the roadway—that leads to tragedy. That’s why evidence like vehicle positioning, lighting condition reports, dash cam footage, and witness statements will be key to understanding how this collision unfolded.


Key Takeaways:

  • Tow trucks operating in or near travel lanes have a heightened duty to ensure they’re visible and not creating a hazard for other drivers.
  • A 3:30 a.m. crash raises questions about visibility, lighting, and whether either driver was impaired or fatigued.
  • Investigators will review vehicle lighting, positioning, and dash cam footage to determine who had the opportunity to avoid the collision.
  • Liability may turn on whether proper safety measures were in place during any roadside activity by the tow truck.
  • Determining whether this was a preventable incident will depend on hard evidence, not assumptions about the hour or conditions.

Explore cases we take