UPDATE (June 20, 2025): Recent reports have been released which identify the pedestrian who lost his life as a result of this car accident as Larry Harrison. No other details are currently available. Investigations continue.
Liverpool, TX — February 23, 2025, a man was killed in a pedestrian versus car accident just after 8:15 p.m. along State Highway 35.
According to authorities, a 61-year-old man was on foot along S.H. 35 in the vicinity northeast of the County Road 192 intersection when the accident took place.
The cause of the accident remains unclear. Officials indicate that, for reasons yet to be confirmed, the pedestrian failed to yield the right-of-way to a motor vehicle. A collision consequently took place between the man and northeast bound Infiniti. The victim reportedly suffered fatal injuries due to the accident. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a pedestrian is fatally struck by a vehicle, especially on a highway like State Highway 35, it’s common for the focus to immediately shift to whether the person on foot was where they were supposed to be. But in my experience, these crashes often deserve a more careful and complete review. To understand what truly led to this collision and whether it could have been avoided, there are three critical questions that should be asked.
First, did the authorities conduct a thorough investigation? In pedestrian crashes, it’s essential to determine not just where the person was walking, but also whether the driver had a reasonable opportunity to see and avoid them. That means assessing factors like lighting, weather conditions, the presence (or absence) of streetlights or crosswalks, and the design of the road itself. Officials should also document the speed of the vehicle and whether the driver was distracted, impaired, or fatigued. If those elements weren’t fully explored, further investigation may be needed to establish the full context of the crash.
Second, has anyone considered whether a vehicle defect might have played a role in the collision? While it may seem less likely in pedestrian crashes, a vehicle with faulty headlights, malfunctioning brakes, or an unresponsive steering system can drastically reduce a driver’s ability to avoid a hazard—even one they might otherwise have been able to react to. These kinds of defects require a forensic examination of the vehicle, which is only possible if it’s preserved in its post-crash state.
Lastly, has all the relevant electronic data been collected? Modern vehicles often contain event data recorders that capture key pre-crash information, including vehicle speed, braking behavior, throttle input, and even whether the headlights were on. This kind of information can help clarify whether the driver was reacting appropriately and whether the vehicle’s systems functioned as intended. Additional sources—like nearby surveillance footage, dashcams, or even GPS data—can also be vital in reconstructing what happened. As always, this evidence is time-sensitive and must be secured quickly.
When a life is lost and the cause isn’t immediately clear, we can’t rely on assumptions or partial information. Asking these questions is the least that can be done to ensure that those affected by this crash get the clarity and closure they deserve.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us