Hudspeth County, TX — October 10, 2025, Jonathon Forbus was killed and a Livingston woman was injured in a car accident just after 11 p.m. on Interstate 10.
Authorities said a 2002 Toyota Camry was heading west when it left the road and overturned west of Van Horn.

Driver Jonathon Forbus, 19, was pronounced dead at the scene of the crash, according to authorities, while his passenger, an 18-year-old Livingston woman, was hospitalized with serious injuries.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Hudspeth County crash at this time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a crash leaves one young person dead and another seriously hurt, the immediate focus often centers on the loss and the injuries. But beyond that, there’s always the pressing need to understand why things unfolded the way they did. Crashes like these raise questions that don’t always get the attention they deserve in the days that follow.
Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? When a vehicle leaves the road and overturns, investigators need to consider a wide range of scenarios. Was there a sudden maneuver? Did something in the vehicle malfunction? Or was the driver reacting to something outside their control? Unfortunately, not all investigations dig that deep. Especially in rural areas or late-night crashes, it’s not uncommon for first responders to make quick judgments and move on. Did they take the time to reconstruct what happened? Was any crash reconstruction specialist brought in? Without those steps, critical details may have been missed.
Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? With a car over two decades old, wear and tear could have played a role. Brake failures, steering issues or even problems with suspension components can all lead to loss of control, especially at highway speeds. But unless someone physically inspects the car for signs of mechanical failure, something that doesn’t always happen, those possibilities remain buried. It’s not enough to assume human error; the car itself could’ve been part of the problem.
Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Even older vehicles like a 2002 Camry can sometimes contain useful electronic data. More importantly, investigators might be able to gather information from phones, GPS units or even nearby surveillance cameras. Was the driver distracted? Was the vehicle speeding or braking in the moments before the crash? These aren’t questions you can answer just by looking at the scene. They require a digital trail, and someone willing to follow it.
When the dust settles after a serious crash, the easy answers come fast. But it’s the tougher, less obvious questions that often reveal what really happened. Digging deeper doesn’t just clarify the past. It protects people in the future.
Key Takeaways:
- Investigations should go beyond surface-level assessments, especially in fatal rollover crashes.
- Mechanical issues in older vehicles need to be ruled out, not assumed away.
- Digital evidence can provide a clearer picture, but only if someone goes looking for it.