Bexar County, TX — October 23, 2025, Johnny Jones Jr. was injured due to a car accident at approximately 10:15 p.m. along Interstate Highway 10.
According to authorities, 37-year-old Johnny Jones Jr. was traveling in a southbound Buick LeSabre on I-10 in the vicinity of Balcones Road North when the accident took place.
Officials indicate that another vehicle allegedly changed lanes at an unsafe time. As a result of its attempts to avoid a collision with that vehicle, the LeSabre was apparently involved in a single-vehicle crash in which it struck a concrete traffic barrier.
Jones reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a driver is injured while trying to avoid another vehicle, the question isn’t just what happened—it’s whether anyone is taking a serious look at how it unfolded. A single-vehicle crash caused by another driver’s lane change shouldn’t be written off just because only one car hit something. What matters is whether the response treats it as a potentially complex incident, not just a byproduct of defensive driving.
1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Avoidance crashes are tricky, and that makes the quality of the investigation even more important. Did officers identify the other vehicle involved? Was there an attempt to locate dashcams, eyewitnesses, or traffic cameras that might confirm the lane change? When the only visible damage is from the car that swerved, there’s a risk investigators won’t dig deeper. But confirming how and why the Buick struck the barrier depends on solid evidence, not assumptions.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
Sudden maneuvers—like quick swerving or hard braking—can test a vehicle’s systems. If the LeSabre had worn steering components, soft brakes, or suspension problems, that could have affected how the driver responded. In fact, even a slight delay or uneven response could be enough to turn an avoidance attempt into a crash. But that kind of failure won’t show up in a written report—it requires a hands-on inspection, and often, that never happens unless someone insists on it.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Even older vehicles like the LeSabre may have crash data modules capable of storing pre-impact speed, steering, and brake input. If that data is pulled quickly, it could confirm that the driver took evasive action and whether the car responded as expected. Surveillance footage or nearby dashcams could also help verify whether another vehicle was present and what it did. Without that digital evidence, it becomes one driver’s word against a blank spot in the report.
When a crash is caused by trying to avoid something worse, it deserves the same investigative effort as any collision involving direct impact. Because a near-miss that still ends in injury isn’t just bad luck—it’s a sign that something important might have gone overlooked.
Key Takeaways:
- Crashes caused by evasive action still require thorough scene investigation.
- Vehicle condition may influence how effectively a driver can avoid danger.
- Digital evidence like vehicle telemetry or camera footage can confirm how the crash unfolded.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us