Basic Facts
Crash date: March 28, 2026
Crash location: Two Creeks near the Two Winds intersection in Scenic Oaks, Bexar County, Texas
People involved:
- Jared Garza, 24
Do authorities suspect alcohol played a role in this crash? unknown
Did authorities recommend criminal charges? unknown
Do authorities suspect a product defect caused the crash? unknown
Accident Report
March 28, 2026, Jared Garza was injured due to a single-car accident shortly after 12:00 midnight along Two Creeks.
According to authorities, 24-year-old Jared Garza was traveling in a northwest bound Chevrolet Camaro on Two Creeks near the Two Winds intersection when the accident took place. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, the Camaro was allegedly traveling at unsafe speeds. It was consequently involved in a single-vehicle collision in which it apparently struck a light pole.
Garza reportedly sustained serious injuries as a result of the wreck. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
How Did This Accident Occur?
Most people who hear about this accident will assume it to have been a cut-and-dried case of driver error. It’s a safe bet, considering the fact that human error plays a role in the majority of car accidents. However, I’ve been in this line of business for over thirty years. In that time, I’ve seen plenty of cases in which evidence of less likely causes ended up being unearthed by the investigation. Because of that, I hesitate to jump to conclusions.
That’s not to imply that I know more about this accident than anyone else outside of the investigation. I just want to point out that, hypothetically, something could have gone wrong with the Camaro to lead to its excessive speed. What if, for example, it was dealing with brake failure? Or perhaps the throttle got stuck in the open position? An in-depth vehicle inspection would bring to light any mechanical malfunctions or product defects that might otherwise have flown under the radar.
I understand that these types of inspections—done by trained professionals in a laboratory setting—are not routinely done in most car accident investigations; a special request might have to be made. If the authorities still fail to take that step, then a third party investigation can always be called upon to do so, instead. That way, all the bases are covered. After all, the people affected by this accident deserve to be given a clear and detailed understanding as to not only how it occurred, but why. That kind of clarity simply can’t be provided by surface-level investigation.
What do you think of my assessment? Do you think it holds water? Or do you think I’m just brewing a storm in a teapot? Let me know in a comment below.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us