Wharton County, TX — January 18, 2025, James Greenwood was injured in a single-car accident at approximately 10:30 p.m. along Farm to Market 640.

According to authorities, 38-year-old James Greenwood was traveling in a southwest bound Chrysler 300 on F.M. 640 in the vicinity northeast of Glen Flora when the accident took place.

James Greenwood Injured in Single-car Accident on F.M. 640 in Wharton County, TX

Officials indicate that, for reasons yet to be confirmed, the Chrysler failed to safely maintain its lane of travel. It was consequently involved in a single-vehicle accident in which it collided with a tree. Greenwood reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a vehicle leaves the roadway and strikes a fixed object—such as a tree—as reportedly happened in this Wharton County crash involving James Greenwood, many assume that driver error was the sole cause. But in my experience, these types of single-vehicle accidents often involve deeper issues that a basic report can miss. To fully understand what led to the crash and whether it could have been prevented, three critical questions must be asked.

First, did investigators thoroughly document the scene and roadway conditions? Lane departure accidents can be caused or worsened by a number of environmental factors: poorly marked lanes, unexpected curves, low visibility, or even a sudden obstacle in the road. Was the area well lit? Were road markings clear? Was there any indication that Mr. Greenwood swerved to avoid something? Investigators should have carefully examined and photographed the crash site, including tire marks, roadway surface conditions, and any contributing features of the terrain.

Second, has anyone considered whether a mechanical failure might have contributed to the crash? A sudden loss of steering control, brake failure, or tire blowout could have caused the Chrysler 300 to veer off the road, even if the driver was alert and driving appropriately for conditions. These are the kinds of issues that don’t always leave obvious clues and require a detailed forensic inspection of the vehicle. That inspection must be done quickly, while the car remains in its post-crash condition, before any repairs or removals eliminate potential evidence.

Finally, has all relevant electronic and digital data been collected? The Chrysler 300 likely includes an event data recorder—commonly referred to as a “black box”—which can provide critical insight into the vehicle’s behavior in the seconds leading up to the crash. Speed, throttle position, braking input, and steering angle can all help determine whether the vehicle behaved as expected and whether the driver made any effort to regain control. Investigators should also look for GPS data, dashcam footage (if present), and any nearby surveillance video that could help reconstruct the full timeline of the incident.

Answering these three questions is critical to making sure that no stone is left unturned in understanding the causes of a crash like this. Serious wrecks deserve serious investigation, not assumptions. Getting clear answers to these questions is crucial for those seeking to understand what happened and why—and it’s the least that can be done to help those affected find the clarity and closure they deserve.

Explore cases we take