Travis County, TX — December 31, 2024, James Cardle was killed an a woman was injured in a car accident at approximately 6:00 p.m. along Ranch to Market 620.
According to authorities, 91-year-old James Cardle and a 90-year-old woman were traveling in a southbound Lexus on R.M. 620 in the vicinity southeast of the Cavalier Drive intersection when the accident took place.
Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, the Lexus attempted a left turn at an apparently unsafe time, failing to yield the right-of-way to oncoming traffic. This resulted in a collision between the Lexus and a northbound Cadillac.
Cardle suffered fatal injuries over the course of the accident, according to reports. The woman who had been behind the wheel of the Lexus sustained reportedly moderate injuries, as well. It does not appear that anyone else was hurt. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I read about a crash like the one in Travis County that claimed the life of James Cardle and left another person injured, I know that many people will assume it was simply a case of driver misjudgment. While that may be true, my experience has shown me that intersection crashes—especially those involving left turns—are often more complex than they first appear. Instead of making assumptions, it’s important to ask the right questions to ensure that all possible contributing factors are explored. To that end, there are three critical questions that need to be considered.
First, did the authorities conduct a thorough investigation? Intersections can be chaotic environments where multiple factors influence a driver’s decision-making. Did law enforcement analyze whether visibility, traffic signal timing, or road design played a role? Were any available traffic cameras or witness statements reviewed to determine if the Lexus had a clear view of oncoming traffic? The quality of the investigation will determine whether all possible explanations are explored or if key details are overlooked.
Second, has anyone looked into whether a vehicle defect contributed to the crash? If the Lexus attempted to yield but failed to stop in time, mechanical issues such as brake malfunctions or steering problems could be a factor. Additionally, if the vehicle had advanced driver assistance systems, did they function as expected? Unfortunately, unless someone specifically requests a forensic vehicle inspection, these possibilities are rarely explored. If the vehicle is quickly repaired or scrapped, any evidence of a defect may be lost before it can be analyzed.
Lastly, have investigators gathered all available electronic data? Most modern vehicles are equipped with event data recorders (EDRs), which capture crucial details such as speed, braking, and steering inputs in the moments leading up to a crash. This data could help clarify whether the driver attempted to stop or if something unexpected happened. Additionally, if any nearby traffic cameras recorded the crash, that footage could provide valuable context. If this evidence isn’t secured quickly, it may become unavailable, making it harder to determine the full circumstances of the accident.
At the end of the day, answering these questions could be essential to understanding what really happened and why. A thorough examination of all three of these issues—including the quality of police investigations, possible vehicle defects, and electronic data—is the least that can be done to ensure that those affected by the crash receive the clarity they deserve.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us