Harris County, TX — November 8, 2023, Hoan Nguyen was injured due to a hit-and-run car accident just before 10:30 p.m. along San Felipe Street.
According to authorities, 71-year-old Hoan Nguyen was traveling in an eastbound Honda CR-V on San Felipe Street at the Kirby Drive intersection when the accident took place.
The intersection is controlled by a traffic signal, and the CR-V apparently had the green light at the time of the wreck. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a northbound Mercedes-Benz entered the intersection at an apparently unsafe time, disregarding the red light. A collision consequently occurred between the front-left of the Honda and the front-end of the Mercedes-Benz.
The 29-year-old woman who had been behind the wheel of the Mercedes-Benz allegedly fled the scene on foot, failing to render aid of any sort to Nguyen, who had reportedly sustained injuries over the course of the accident.
The woman was later located by authorities and has faced charges in connection with the hit-and-run. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
More than a year and a half has now passed since the hit‑and‑run crash at the intersection of San Felipe Street and Kirby Drive in Houston, and that length of time makes it even more important to reflect on whether critical investigative steps were fully addressed.
1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Given the complexity of a collision in which a driver with the green light was struck by another vehicle entering an intersection on red, it’s crucial to ask whether the scene was reconstructed with precision. Did investigators capture traffic signal timing, the exact point of impact between the 71‑year‑old driver’s Honda CR‑V and the northbound Mercedes‑Benz, and the speed and path of the fleeing vehicle? Because an earlier time and subsequent delay may mean key evidence — like skid marks, witness statements, or camera footage — may no longer be intact, the investigative window was narrower than usual.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
Although the driver of the Mercedes is alleged to have ignored the red light and fled, that does not eliminate all mechanical angles. Was the Mercedes inspected for brake system performance, acceleration anomalies, or any sensor data that might show the driver tried to stop or avoid the impact? Did the CR‑V’s data or lighting system get checked to confirm the driver had a valid green signal and was visible? Because more than a year has passed, if these inspections weren’t conducted promptly the opportunity may be lost.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Since the crash occurred in late 2023, digital evidence retention is a real concern. Did the Mercedes log throttle, brake or steering inputs immediately before the collision? Did surveillance or traffic signal cameras in the area capture the event, and were those recordings preserved? What about mobile phone or GPS data from the fleeing driver or other nearby vehicles? Because data in many systems is overwritten or purged after months, delay in securing this evidence can significantly reduce what can be learned now.
When time passes, unanswered questions tend to become permanent uncertainties. It’s essential to ensure accountability and bolster future safety by reviewing all possible angles—even years after the event.
Key Takeaways:
- The crash occurred in November 2023, and critical physical or digital evidence may now be compromised.
- Mechanical inspection of both vehicles remains a necessary step despite the passage of time.
- Immediate retrieval of electronic and surveillance data was essential—and without it, the full picture may not be recoverable.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us