Anderson County, TX — March 5, 2025, Coby Davilla was killed and two others were injured due to a car accident just after 7:00 a.m. along Farm to Market 2419.
According to authorities, a 46-year-old man and 21-year-old Coby Davilla were traveling in a northwest bound Toyota Tundra pickup truck on F.M. 2419 in the vicinity northwest of the County Road 151 intersection when the accident took place.
Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a southeast bound Ford F-350 pickup truck occupied by a 27-year-old man failed to safely maintain its lane of travel. A collision consequently took place between the Ford and the Toyota.
Davilla reportedly sustained fatal injuries due to the wreck. The man who had been behind the wheel of the Tundra suffered serious injuries, as well, while the man from the Ford received minor injuries.
Authorities have apparently recommended multiple charges against the driver of the Ford. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a head-on collision leaves one person dead and another badly hurt, the instinct is to focus on who crossed the line. But even when fault seems clear, that doesn’t answer the deeper questions about how the crash happened—or how it might have been prevented.
1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
A charge recommendation suggests investigators believe they know what happened, but did they analyze the scene in full? In head-on crashes, it’s essential to map out each vehicle’s path, determine speeds, and assess whether there were attempts to brake or steer away. If that level of detail wasn’t captured, then critical information—like how early the danger emerged or how avoidable it may have been—could be missing.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
If the Ford F-350 drifted across the center line, a mechanical failure could have played a role. Steering problems, brake failures, or even a malfunction in a lane-assist system could cause a truck to veer unexpectedly. These are not assumptions—they’re known risks that require inspection. Without a thorough look at the truck’s mechanical systems and safety tech, no one can say for sure whether driver conduct was the only factor at play.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Both trucks are likely equipped with event data recorders that can capture critical inputs like speed, throttle, braking, and steering in the moments before impact. This data can confirm whether the Ford made any corrective moves or if the Toyota had a chance to respond. Phones, GPS, or dashcam footage could also show what led up to the crash. If none of this has been preserved, then the most reliable source of facts may already be gone.
Assigning blame is part of the legal process, but understanding why the crash unfolded the way it did is what helps keep it from happening again. That requires more than pointing fingers—it requires full answers.
- Full scene analysis should show how and when the lane departure occurred.
- Mechanical issues could explain sudden, unintentional crossing of the center line.
- Digital crash data can confirm each driver’s actions and whether the crash could’ve been avoided.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us