Van Zandt County, TX — June 27, 2024, Cheryl Reichert and two others were injured in a car accident at approximately 1:45 p.m. along State Highway 64.
According to authorities, 59-year-old Cheryl Reichert and a 26-year-old woman were traveling in a northwest bound Chevrolet Suburban on S.H. 64 at the Farm to Market 773 intersection when the accident took place. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a southbound Toyota Camry occupied by a 61-year-old man attempted a left turn from F.M. 773 to head southeast on the highway at an apparently unsafe time, failing to yield the right-of-way at a stop sign. A collision consequently occurred between the left side of the Camry and the front-end of the Suburban.
Reichert reportedly suffered serious injuries over the course of the accident. The 26-year-old from the Suburban and the 61-year-old from the Camry both sustained minor injuries, as well, according to reports. They were each transported to area medical facilities by EMS in order to receive necessary treatment. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
Crashes at rural intersections often follow a familiar pattern, but that doesn’t mean they’re simple. When someone is seriously hurt, the real challenge is making sure investigators look deeper than the obvious narrative. Every detail matters—especially when a turn goes wrong and timing is in dispute.
1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
When a vehicle fails to yield from a stop sign, there’s usually a quick assumption about fault. But assumptions don’t explain why the turn was attempted or how the vehicles approached the intersection. Were speeds of both vehicles documented? Did investigators reconstruct the crash to understand timing and angles? If this was treated as just another failure-to-yield, key questions about visibility, reaction time, and driver intent may never have been asked. That kind of oversight happens more often than it should.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
Even a seemingly straightforward turn across traffic can go wrong if a vehicle doesn’t respond as expected. Was there a steering issue or hesitation from the Camry that made the move more dangerous than it seemed? Could the Suburban have had delayed braking or handling problems that affected its ability to avoid the impact? Without a mechanical inspection, these questions often get skipped in favor of quicker explanations.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Crash data from either vehicle could give real clarity. How fast was the Suburban traveling? Did it slow down or attempt to swerve? Did the Camry accelerate into the turn, or was there a delay? Onboard systems and possible camera footage could fill in the gaps that eyewitnesses or physical evidence might not cover. But this information is time-sensitive—and if it wasn’t gathered promptly, it may already be gone.
Clear answers don’t come from assuming who made the last move. They come from investigating how and why those moves happened. Anything less leaves too much to guesswork.
Takeaways:
- Failure-to-yield crashes still need detailed reconstructions to fully understand timing and movement.
- Mechanical issues, even subtle ones, should be ruled out before reaching conclusions.
- Vehicle data and nearby cameras can provide answers that traditional reports may miss.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us