Bexar County, TX — December 31, 2024, one person was injured in a car accident at approximately 9:00 p.m. along State Loop 1604.
According to authorities, a 28-year-old man was traveling in a southbound Yamaha motorcycle on Redland Road at the State Loop 1604 intersection when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a northbound Buick Encore on Redland Road attempted a left turn at an apparently unsafe time, failing to yield the right-of-way to oncoming traffic. This resulted in a collision between the Encore and the motorcycle.
The motorcyclist suffered serious injuries due to the accident. No other injuries have been reported. Additional details pertaining to this incident—including the identity of the victim—are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
Crashes involving motorcycles and left-turning vehicles are tragically common, and they frequently result in serious injuries for the motorcyclist—often with little warning and few ways to avoid the collision. That appears to be the case here in Bexar County, where a left-turning vehicle reportedly failed to yield to an oncoming motorcycle. While the surface-level explanation might seem obvious, in my experience, the real causes of these collisions are often far more nuanced. And to get to the truth, we must start with three critical questions.
First, did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? A failure to yield is a violation, but the key is understanding the conditions under which the driver made that decision. Was the motorcyclist visible? Was there a sightline obstruction at the intersection? Was the driver distracted or misled by traffic signals or lighting conditions? A complete investigation should involve not only statements and diagrams, but also an analysis of visibility, surveillance footage from nearby businesses or traffic infrastructure, and a close look at the intersection’s design. If that level of scrutiny wasn’t applied, an independent reconstruction may be needed to uncover what the official review might have missed.
Second, has anyone considered whether a vehicle defect could have contributed to the crash? The most common assumption is that the driver misjudged the turn—but what if the Buick Encore’s turn signal, braking system, or onboard driver-assistance tech malfunctioned? Similarly, the Yamaha motorcycle should also be inspected to rule out a brake issue or lighting failure that could have reduced the rider’s visibility to others. These types of mechanical problems typically require a forensic inspection to identify, and that process can only happen if the vehicles are preserved in their post-crash condition. Without it, critical evidence may be lost forever.
The final question is whether all available electronic data has been collected. The Encore almost certainly contains an event data recorder that can show speed, throttle input, and steering angle leading up to the collision. That data can help verify whether the driver attempted to brake or turn properly—or whether there was a delay or failure in the vehicle’s response. Investigators should also look at local traffic cameras, security footage, and any dashcams or cell phone data that could provide a clearer timeline of how the crash unfolded. The motorcycle may not have an onboard recorder, but cell phone GPS or apps may provide helpful context about speed and location.
Answering these three questions is critical to making sure that no stone is left unturned in understanding the causes of a crash like this. Serious wrecks deserve serious investigation, not assumptions. Getting clear answers to these questions is crucial for those seeking to understand what happened and why—and it’s the least that can be done to help those affected find the clarity and closure they deserve.