Carthage, TX — March 20, 2025, A child was injured following a car accident that occurred at around 6:40 P.M. on East Ash Street.
An investigation is underway into a car accident that left a 5-year-old boy injured during the evening hours of March 20th. According to official reports, a boy was playing on his electric scooter in the 100 block of East Ash Street when he was struck by a Cadillac which then fled the scene without stopping to render aid.
After the boy was assessed by first responders on the scene he was found to have sustained serious injuries and he was transported to the hospital for treatment. The driver of the Cadillac was later arrested and according to official statements the boy did not suffer life-threatening injuries.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I read about a child being struck by a vehicle—especially in a hit-and-run situation—it’s understandable that emotions run high and people want immediate answers. But even in cases where a suspect is quickly located, the investigation shouldn’t stop there. To truly understand how and why a crash occurred, especially when a child is seriously hurt, we must ask three essential questions: Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? Has anyone considered whether a vehicle defect may have played a role? And has all the relevant electronic data been preserved?
In this instance, the boy was reportedly riding an electric scooter when he was struck by a Cadillac that left the scene. That’s a serious legal issue on its own, but from an investigative standpoint, the key concern is whether the circumstances of the crash have been fully analyzed. A proper investigation should include scene documentation, measurements, witness interviews, lighting and visibility assessments, and consideration of how fast the vehicle was traveling. These steps are essential to establish whether the driver had a reasonable opportunity to avoid the collision—even before the decision to flee.
The second question, often overlooked in cases where a driver is arrested, is whether a mechanical defect may have contributed to the crash. It’s not uncommon for braking failures, steering issues, or problems with headlight visibility to play a role in vehicle-pedestrian collisions, particularly in low-light areas. If a defect impaired the driver’s ability to stop in time, it’s important that this be identified—not to excuse illegal behavior, but to ensure the same hazard doesn’t exist in other vehicles still on the road. Identifying those problems requires access to the vehicle and a professional inspection before it’s altered or repaired.
Lastly, we must consider whether all relevant electronic data has been collected. Modern vehicles are equipped with electronic control modules (ECMs) that can store pre-crash data such as speed, braking input, and throttle position. That data could help determine how fast the Cadillac was traveling and whether the driver attempted to slow down or take evasive action. Additional evidence, like surveillance footage from nearby homes or businesses and any available dashcam or cell phone data, could also be critical in filling in the gaps. But as with any digital evidence, it’s at risk of being lost unless someone acts quickly to preserve it.
While it’s encouraging that the child’s injuries were not life-threatening and that the driver has been located, those facts don’t eliminate the need for a deeper investigation. Only by answering all three of these questions can we ensure the full picture is known—not just for accountability in this case, but to help prevent similar incidents from happening in the future.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us