Harris County, TX — June 19, 2024, Armando Cervantes was injured in a hit-and-run car accident just before 4:15 p.m. on Reveille Street.

According to authorities, 45-year-old Armando Cervantes was traveling in a northbound Ford F-150 pickup truck on Reveille Street in the vicinity north of the Thurow Street intersection when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a northbound pickup truck of unknown make or model apparently failed to appropriately control its speed. A collision consequently occurred between the front-end of the unknown pickup truck and the rear-end of the F-150.

The striking pickup truck allegedly fled the scene, the person(s) inside failing to stop and render aid of any sort to the victim. Cervantes reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident. EMS transported him to a local medical facility so he could receive necessary treatment.

Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

In any crash where someone is seriously injured and the other driver flees, it raises deeper questions than just who caused the impact. A hit-and-run isn’t just a violation of the law—it’s an obstacle to understanding what really happened. When the other party disappears, so does a critical part of the truth.

1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Even when the driver is missing, there’s still plenty investigators can do. Was the scene documented in detail—impact angles, skid marks, debris fields? Did they canvass for surveillance cameras or nearby witnesses who might have caught a plate number or captured footage? In rear-end collisions, it’s important to establish whether the F-150 had stopped, slowed, or signaled in any way. Without those details, the context of the crash stays incomplete.

2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
When a driver flees, it may be because they were impaired, unlicensed—or because their vehicle wasn’t roadworthy. Was there a brake failure? Steering issue? The answers may never be known without the vehicle, but Cervantes’s F-150 should still be inspected to rule out any contributing defects, especially if the force of the crash was greater than expected. A failure in headrests, seat backs, or restraint systems could have made the injuries worse than they had to be.

3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
The F-150 likely captured event data like speed, braking, and throttle activity before impact. Was that data downloaded to show whether Cervantes was stopped or slowing at the time? Was nearby traffic camera footage or private surveillance reviewed? In hit-and-run cases, that kind of digital trail can be the key to confirming events—and potentially identifying the fleeing vehicle.

A hit-and-run leaves a lot of holes behind, both legally and factually. But that doesn’t mean those gaps can’t be narrowed. With the right effort, the missing parts of the story can still come to light.

Takeaways:

  • Thorough scene documentation and canvassing for video are essential in hit-and-run cases.
  • Mechanical issues in the victim’s vehicle should be ruled out through inspection.
  • Event data and nearby surveillance may clarify crash dynamics and aid in identifying the other driver.

Explore cases we take