Update (January 26, 2026): The driver accused of causing this accident has been indicted January 21 on three counts of manslaughter and three counts of criminally negligent homicide in connection with the crash.
Grayson County, TX — May 17, 2025, Tommy Moorehead III and two children were killed in a car accident at about 12:30 p.m. on F.M. 3133.
Authorities said a Dodge Ram 3500 was trying to pass another vehicle in a no-passing zone near Jim Cannon Road when it crashed head on with a Chevrolet Silverado, causing the other truck to catch fire.

Silverado driver Tommy Moorehead III, 41, and two children, ages 4 and 6, died in the crash, according to authorities.
The driver of the Dodge, who was injured in the crash, has been arrested on three counts of manslaughter, authorities said.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Grayson County crash.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
After a crash like this, I think most people have plenty of questions. However, some questions tend to be overlooked by crash investigators, questions that could make all the difference in understanding what really happened. That’s why I always come back to three critical areas that don’t get enough attention in the early days after a serious wreck.
First, did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? From what’s been reported, law enforcement acted quickly to arrest one driver on serious charges. But speed doesn’t always mean thoroughness. In cases like this, especially when there’s a head-on collision and a resulting fire, the scene is chaotic and can be difficult to analyze properly. Skid marks, debris fields and road conditions all tell part of the story, but only if someone takes the time to record and interpret them carefully. We also need to consider the road design. Was the no-passing zone clearly marked? Were there any obstructions to visibility? These are the kinds of details that can make the difference between reckless behavior and a tragic mistake.
That brings me to the second question: has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? Just because someone crossed a center line doesn’t mean they did it on purpose. Mechanical issues — like a stuck throttle, blown tire or steering failure — can send a vehicle into oncoming traffic in an instant. And in a fire like the one described, there’s a real chance that something went wrong in the Silverado’s fuel system or electrical wiring that caused it to ignite. These possibilities are rarely checked unless someone specifically asks for that kind of analysis. But if a defect played even a small role, it’s something that needs to be brought to light.
The third question I always ask is: has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Today’s vehicles carry a treasure trove of information, from speed and braking to steering inputs and even lane positioning. Most folks don’t realize that both the Dodge Ram and the Silverado are likely equipped with engine control modules (ECMs) that could show exactly what happened in the moments leading up to the impact. That data could help confirm, or contradict, statements made by those involved. It could also show whether the Dodge was actually trying to pass, or if something else entirely was going on. But that information is time-sensitive. If it’s not preserved quickly, it can be lost forever.
In the end, the goal isn’t to second-guess what’s already been done. It’s to make sure nothing was missed. Families affected by crashes like this deserve clear, evidence-based answers. And that only happens when we’re willing to dig deeper and ask the right questions.
Key Takeaways:
- It’s important to examine whether police documented every piece of crash evidence at the scene.
- Mechanical problems or vehicle defects can sometimes explain unexpected driving behavior.
- Vehicle electronics can provide critical insight, but that data must be preserved quickly.
- Fires after crashes should trigger questions about potential fuel system or electrical issues.
- Thorough investigations often require looking beyond the surface and asking detailed questions.