Basic Facts

Crash date: May 13, 2026

Crash location: Farm to Market 119 northeast of the Bear Lane intersection in Moore County, Texas

People involved:

  • Scott Atwood, 62 (Subaru)
  • Unidentified man, 32 (Peterbilt)

Do authorities suspect alcohol played a role in this crash? unknown

Did authorities recommend criminal charges? unknown

Do authorities suspect a product defect caused the crash? unknown

Accident Report

May 13, 2026, Scott Atwood was injured due to a truck accident just after 5:00 a.m. along Farm to Market 119.

According to authorities, 62-year-old Scott Atwood was traveling in a northeast bound Subaru on F.M. 119 in the vicinity northeast of the Bear Lane intersection when the accident took place. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a northwest bound Peterbilt truck made a turn at an unsafe time. A collision consequently occurred between the back-left quarter of the Peterbilt’s trailer and the front-left quarter of the Subaru.

Atwood reportedly sustained serious injuries as a result of the wreck. It does not appear that anyone else was hurt. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

How Did This Accident Occur?

Over the last thirty years of my career, I’ve had the opportunity to analyze hundreds of truck accidents. When it comes to trucks making unsafe turns, I’ve noticed how most people are extremely quick to point the finger at the driver and move on. What people don’t realize is that the term “driver error” is not the be-all-end-all of the situation. What investigators will need to do now is discover the reason behind said error.

To be clear, I do not know more about this specific accident than anyone else outside of the investigation. I do not pretend to know for sure that driver error was the cause of the unsafe turn; nor am I in a position to say that something else—such as mechanical issues or product defects—couldn’t have been at play. An in-depth vehicle inspection would be able to bring to light anything like that—such as brake failure or throttle issues, for example—that might otherwise fly under the radar. However, if there was an issue with the truck itself, then I would be interested to know whether or not the company has a habit of skipping regular inspections or scheduled maintenance in an effort to safe itself time and money.

What I can say is that truck cabs are much like offices on wheels. Investigators should collect any available in-cab video and cellphone records in order to ascertain whether or not the driver was distracted and if so, by what. Maybe he was getting a radio call from his dispatch. Perhaps he was glancing down to switch the music on the radio or change the level of the cabin air conditioning or heat. It could even have been cellphone use or a GPS.

Beyond that, there is the fact that the wreck happened in the dark hours of the early morning; considering that, driver fatigue should not be overlooked as a possible cause of the error. It might be prudent for investigators to look into the driving logs, not just for that particular trucker, but for the entire company affiliated with it. It could be that the company pushes unsafe driving hours and fails to give their drivers the rest that is required in order to keep them and other drivers on the roads safe all for the sake of making unrealistic delivery schedules work.

Hopefully the authorities are being as meticulous and openminded as they should be as they work this accident. However, should their work seem shortsighted, for whatever reason, then a third party investigation can always be brought in to ensure that nothing important falls through the cracks. It never hurts to have another perspective go over things and make sure that all the bases are covered. When push comes to shove, it’s possible that decisions made well before the accident by people who were not even at the scene had a direct affect on the accident and its outcome. The people investigating should do everything in their power to ensure that everyone who had a hand in this wreck is able to be held accountable. After all, that is what the people affected by this wreck deserve. Vague assumptions based on surface-level investigation just won’t cut it.

What are your thoughts about my suggestions and assessment of this accident? Do you agree with me, or do you think I’m just brewing a storm in a teapot? Feel free to leave a comment below letting me know.

Explore cases we take