Rusk County, TX — July 8, 2024, one person was killed and Ricky and Angela Shires were injured in a car accident at about 1:15 p.m. along State Highway 64.
According to authorities, 47-year-old Ricky Shires and 55-year-old Angela Shires were traveling in a westbound Acura SUV on S.H. 64 in the vicinity east of the County Road 4151 intersection when the accident took place. The weather and road conditions in the area at the time were apparently rainy and wet. Officials indicate that an eastbound Honda CR-V occupied by a 41-year-old man hydroplaned and lost control, veering into the oncoming lanes of the highway. There, it was involved in a head-on collision with the westbound Acura. The impact caused the Honda to overturn, coming to a stop resting on its right side.
The man who had been behind the wheel of the Honda reportedly suffered fatal injuries over the course of the accident. Both Ricky Shires and Angela Shires sustained serious injuries, as well; they were transported to local medical facilities by EMS in order to receive necessary treatment. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a vehicle crosses into oncoming lanes during wet conditions, the real question isn’t just about the weather—it’s about whether every contributing factor was examined with the care the situation demands.
1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
In this case, hydroplaning may have been noted as the cause, but that shouldn’t be where the investigation ends. Officials needed to look at the speed of the Honda before it lost control, whether the tires had sufficient tread, and how far into the oncoming lane the vehicle drifted. Just as important is understanding what options, if any, the Acura’s driver had to avoid the crash. A full reconstruction helps clarify whether both vehicles were operating within a safe margin or if poor choices or conditions closed the gap too quickly.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
Aquaplaning isn’t always the fault of the driver. If the Honda had issues with its suspension, tire pressure regulation, or stability control systems, those could have made the loss of control much more likely. And the severity of the collision raises questions about crashworthiness on both vehicles—especially the Honda’s ability to resist rollover. If no mechanical inspections were performed, then important context may have been overlooked.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Vehicle data could show how fast the Honda was traveling, whether any braking occurred before or during the loss of control, and whether traction control was active. In the Acura, similar data could confirm any last-second evasive maneuvers. If the area has traffic cameras or nearby businesses with surveillance systems, footage might also exist to support or challenge what’s in the official report. Without this information, what remains are partial answers.
A crash like this doesn’t start with impact—it starts with the conditions, the decisions, and the performance of the vehicles in motion. That’s where a real investigation begins.
Takeaways:
- A full investigation should look beyond the weather to include speed, tread, and evasive action.
- Mechanical issues might contribute to or worsen hydroplaning events.
- Vehicle data can help determine how the crash developed and whether it was avoidable.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us