Fort Worth, TX — September 18, 2025, Murphy Walls was killed in a car accident at about 10:40 p.m. in the 6600 block of Northwest Loop 820/Jim Wright Freeway.
A preliminary accident report indicates that a 2013 Toyota Corolla was heading northeast when it hit a pedestrian in the eastbound service lane.
The pedestrian, 28-year-old Murphy Walls, died in the crash, according to the report.
The Toyota driver, who was not hurt, has been charged with collision involving death, the report states.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Tarrant County crash at this time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a person loses their life in a traffic crash, questions naturally follow; some obvious, others more uncomfortable. It’s easy to assume that charges mean the story’s already told. But experience shows that even when someone is held responsible, critical pieces of the puzzle can still go missing. That’s why it’s important to ask the right questions; not just to assign blame, but to understand the full picture.
Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? Serious crashes should trigger thorough scene work, especially when they lead to a fatality and criminal charges. That kind of attention can’t stop at visual checks and witness statements. Did investigators reconstruct the sequence of events? Did they map the area using laser tools or review video from nearby businesses? It’s not always a given. Some departments invest the time and training, others don’t. When a pedestrian is involved, pinning down vehicle speed and driver reaction time becomes even more crucial. If shortcuts were taken, there’s a risk that key facts were missed or misunderstood.
Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? It’s easy to assume a driver was solely at fault, especially if they’ve been charged. But that assumption only holds up if the vehicle itself was proven to be in working order. If the brakes failed or if the steering system malfunctioned, that could change how we interpret the driver’s actions. Older models, like a 2013 Toyota, may have wear-and-tear issues that aren’t obvious without a professional inspection. The question is, did anyone pop the hood and look?
Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Modern vehicles carry a silent witness in the form of onboard data: logs that can show braking patterns, speed and steering inputs. That kind of evidence can verify or challenge a driver’s account in ways that human memory can’t. In crashes involving pedestrians, phone use and distraction are also relevant. Was the driver texting or using navigation? Investigators should’ve pulled whatever data they could from the car, the driver’s phone and nearby traffic cameras. If they didn’t, a big part of the story could be missing.
When someone dies in a crash, it’s not enough to know that a charge was filed. The deeper story — why it happened, whether it could have been prevented and whether all the facts are on the table — matters just as much. Without that, we’re left with conclusions that might be neat, but not necessarily right.
Key Takeaways:
- Even when charges are filed, not every crash investigation goes deep enough to catch all the facts.
- Vehicle defects can play a hidden role and often get overlooked without a hands-on inspection.
- Pulling electronic data is essential to confirm what really happened in the moments before a crash.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us