Tyler, TX — October 17, 2025, Mary Imbs was injured in a hit-and-run accident at about 9:20 p.m. in the 1600 block of South Broadway Avenue.
A preliminary accident report indicates that a southbound 2020 Chevrolet Malibu allegedly ran a stop sign and collided with a 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe that was going west on
A passenger in the Tahoe, 37-year-old Mary Imbs, was seriously injured in the crash, according to the report. The 69-year-old man driving the SUV was listed as possibly injured.
The report shows the Malibu driver was unknown.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Smith County crash at this time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
After any serious crash, especially those involving hit-and-run drivers, there’s often more confusion than clarity. People want to understand what happened, but the answers don’t always come easily. That’s why it’s worth asking some harder questions about how the crash was handled and what might still be missing from the investigation.
Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? It’s unclear how deep investigators went in piecing together the events on South Broadway Avenue. Given that one driver apparently fled the scene, there’s reason to hope the crash site was carefully documented; ideally with measurements, diagrams and perhaps even 3D scans. But hit-and-run cases often stretch thin law enforcement resources, and not every agency has specialists trained in advanced crash reconstruction. If the initial effort focused mostly on obvious physical damage or eyewitness accounts, key dynamics — like the angles of impact or whether either vehicle tried to brake — might not have been captured. Without a known driver in the other car, the burden shifts even more toward the evidence left behind.
Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? Whenever a vehicle fails to stop at a sign, it’s easy to chalk it up to human error. But that assumption can overlook real mechanical problems. In this case, it’s worth asking whether the Malibu’s brakes or steering had issues that could have prevented proper control. Investigators should be looking for signs of worn-out brake components, failed sensors or anything else that could shift the narrative from reckless driving to equipment failure.
Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Even when a suspect flees, both vehicles involved may still carry digital clues. The Tahoe’s onboard systems might hold data about speed, braking and seatbelt use in the moments before the collision. The Malibu’s electronic logs could reveal who was behind the wheel or whether the car had been in another crash recently. Also, traffic or security cameras in that area might have captured footage of the crash or the Malibu fleeing. In cases like this, where accountability is uncertain, digital evidence becomes even more critical.
As frustrating as hit-and-run crashes are, they also highlight the importance of leaving no stone unturned. Behind every unanswered question is an opportunity to get closer to the truth, if someone is willing to keep digging.
Key Takeaways:
- Not all crash investigations go beyond surface-level observations.
- Vehicle problems are easy to overlook when the driver isn’t on hand to explain what happened.
- Crash data and video footage could hold the key to identifying a hit-and-run driver.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us