Garland, TX — August 21, 2025, Markia Walters was injured as the result of a car accident at around 10:00 p.m. along Highway 78.
According to preliminary details about the accident, it happened just north of the TX-78 and Walnut Street intersection.

Investigators said that 23-year-old Markia Walters was in a Toyota Camry going northbound along the highway. A Ford Fusion was going southbound. Somehow, the two vehicles crossed paths and collided.
Due to this, Markia Walters was seriously injured. The other driver had no apparent injuries. Additional details are unavailable.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When two vehicles collide head-on and only one person walks away injured, it’s natural to want answers. But without a full investigation, the truth about what really happened may never come to light.
1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Collisions like this should prompt a detailed scene analysis. Was the impact point mapped? Did investigators determine which vehicle crossed over and why? Late-night wrecks often get chalked up quickly, and that can lead to missing or incomplete conclusions that don’t hold up under scrutiny.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
If one of the drivers veered unexpectedly, it’s fair to ask whether a mechanical issue played a role. Brake failure, steering trouble, or malfunctioning lane assist systems could all cause a sudden deviation—especially if the driver had no time to react. These issues rarely show themselves without a close mechanical inspection, and they’re often left out of the discussion unless someone insists on it.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Both vehicles likely stored key crash data—steering input, speed, and braking actions in the final moments. GPS or phone activity could also shed light on whether distraction or sudden movement played a role. If none of that information has been reviewed, the story of how the crash happened is still incomplete.
These questions can help keep things on track. If investigators have clear answers, that’s good. If they come up short, steps can be taken to have more thorough investigators look into things. That way, nothing important slips through the cracks.
Key Takeaways:
- Opposite-direction collisions require thorough analysis to determine fault.
- Vehicle malfunctions may cause sudden lane departures and need to be ruled out.
- Crash data can clarify key moments—if someone takes the time to pull it.