Alvin, TX — March 15, 2025, Jacob Ainsworth was injured in a car accident at about 4:45 p.m. at State Highway 35 and East South Street.
A preliminary accident report indicates a 2016 Chevrolet Malibu collided with a 2020 Land Rover Sport at the intersection.
Chevrolet driver Jacob Ainsworth, 26, suffered serious injuries in the crash, according to authorities.
The 14-year-old boy who was driving the Land Rover was not injured, the report states.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Brazoria County crash.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I read about a serious accident like the one that happened in Alvin, my immediate concern is whether those affected will get clear answers about how and why the crash occurred. Reports indicate that two vehicles collided, resulting in serious injuries to one person. Another key detail is that one of the vehicles was reportedly driven by a 14-year-old. While that raises obvious concerns, it’s still essential to approach this case with the three guiding questions that should shape any crash investigation: Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? Has anyone considered the possibility of a vehicle defect? And has all the electronic data been collected?
The first question about the thoroughness of the investigation is critical. A crash at a major intersection in broad daylight should allow investigators to collect solid physical evidence: things like skid marks, impact points and signal light timing. But as thorough as that might sound, not every agency has the same training or resources to conduct a full reconstruction. In some cases, authorities may be under pressure to clear the scene quickly or may not have access to advanced tools for measuring and documenting the accident site. Even when something as unusual as a minor operating a vehicle is involved, it’s still essential to ensure the entire sequence of events is reconstructed from all available evidence, not just the most eye-catching detail.
Then there’s the question of vehicle defects. When a newer model SUV and a mid-2010s sedan are involved in a high-impact crash, we can’t rule out the role of mechanical issues. Failures in braking systems, steering columns or electronic throttle controls can all cause or worsen a crash, and these issues aren’t always obvious from a surface-level inspection. Unfortunately, most post-crash procedures don’t include a forensic vehicle examination unless someone steps in to demand it. That’s a problem because once a vehicle is scrapped or repaired, the window to identify a potential defect closes permanently.
Finally, the matter of electronic data is just as important, if not more so. Both vehicles likely contain engine control modules capable of storing vital information from the moments before the crash. This could include speed, braking input, steering angles and even throttle position. That kind of data helps tell the story of what happened when human memory or physical evidence falls short. Additionally, there may be GPS systems, in-car telematics and possibly video footage from either onboard systems or nearby businesses. And let’s not forget about cell phones: data from a phone could indicate distraction, navigation use, or even whether someone was attempting to call for help.
When a serious accident like this occurs, the community has a responsibility to make sure every effort is made to answer all of the important questions. That means demanding thorough investigations, not overlooking the role vehicle defects can play and ensuring that no digital evidence is left behind. That is the only way to provide needed answers for those affected by this crash.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us