Dallas, TX — December 27, 2025, one person was injured in a hit-and-run accident at about 5:30 p.m. in the 7700 block of Samuell Boulevard.

A preliminary accident report indicates that an eastbound 2025 Mazda CX-30 collided with a westbound 2016 Chevrolet Silverado while turning left onto Buckner Boulevard/State Highway Loop 12. The Mazda kept going after the crash.

The Chevrolet driver, a 24-year-old Dallas man, was seriously injured in the crash, according to the report. His name has not been made public yet.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Dallas County crash at this time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When someone gets seriously hurt in a crash, the first concern is always for their health; but what often gets lost in the aftermath is how much uncertainty remains about why it happened in the first place. Accidents that unfold in just seconds can leave behind far more questions than answers. That’s especially true when one of the drivers leaves the scene.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? When a crash involves a hit-and-run, investigators already face an uphill battle. Reconstructing what happened depends heavily on how thoroughly the scene was processed; things like whether they documented tire marks, mapped out vehicle positions and tracked down potential security footage. It’s not clear yet how much effort went into this one, but in some cases, limited resources or time pressures mean critical steps get skipped. Whether officers conducted interviews with nearby witnesses or tried to trace the Mazda’s path using traffic cameras could make a major difference.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? It’s easy to assume a driver who fled must be at fault, but it’s also possible they were reacting to something going wrong in the vehicle, like a loss of steering control, brake failure or an electronic glitch. When cars make sudden or erratic moves during turns, it sometimes points to a deeper mechanical issue. Without a full inspection of the Mazda, there’s no way to know whether a defect played a role in how the crash unfolded, or why the driver chose to leave.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? One of the best ways to understand how a crash happened is by reviewing the vehicles’ onboard data. Modern cars, especially late-model Mazdas, often capture speed, steering angles and braking just before impact. That kind of detail can confirm or challenge assumptions made from looking at damage alone. The same goes for cellphone records and dashcam footage, which can help explain what both drivers were doing in those final moments. Whether any of that data has been collected is still unknown.

It’s easy to look at a crash like this and treat it as an open-and-shut case, especially when someone fled. But that kind of thinking can shortchange the truth. Real answers don’t come from first impressions. They come from digging deeper, asking uncomfortable questions and following the evidence wherever it leads.


Key Takeaways:

  • Crash scenes involving hit-and-runs need especially thorough investigation.
  • A mechanical problem could have contributed, even if someone fled afterward.
  • Vehicle and phone data can fill in missing details when drivers can’t, or won’t, explain.

Explore cases we take