La Feria, TX — August 1, 2024, Gregorio Gonzalez was killed in a car accident at about 11:55 p.m. on westbound Interstate 2.
Authorities said a 2007 Chevrolet Malibu hit a pedestrian near North Kansas City Road.
The pedestrian, 60-year-old Gregorio Gonzalez, died at the scene of the crash, according to authorities. He was believed to have been walking to his home in Mercedes.
The Chevrolet driver, who was not hurt, is not facing any charges related to the crash, authorities said.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
It’s natural to search for clarity when a fatal crash happens, especially when someone loses their life in such a sudden and unexpected way. The real answers aren’t always in the initial reports. They’re found in how deeply the right questions get asked.
Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
At nearly midnight, a pedestrian was struck and killed by a driver on the expressway. While officials noted the driver wasn’t injured and won’t face charges, the absence of charges doesn’t necessarily mean every angle was explored. What’s unclear is whether investigators did more than a standard scene walkthrough. Did they laser-map the crash site to reconstruct the moment of impact? Did they evaluate where the pedestrian was walking, how visible he might have been and how far in advance the driver could have responded?
Those kinds of details require time, resources and experience, especially when a crash happens at night, when visibility is low and variables pile up. It’s not unusual for these cases to be wrapped up quickly based on surface details, leaving critical questions about the driver’s conduct or response unaddressed.
Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
Just because the vehicle involved was a 2007 Chevrolet doesn’t mean it was immune to failure. Older vehicles are more likely to suffer from undiagnosed issues: brake wear, steering problems or malfunctioning headlights or sensors, all of which could play a role in a driver’s ability to avoid a pedestrian in the road.
Did anyone perform a post-crash inspection of the Malibu? Were its lights working? Did the brakes respond properly? Was there any history of power loss or steering problems? Even if the vehicle seemed fine, assuming mechanical systems performed as expected without checking is a risk that shouldn’t be taken.
Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Though the vehicle may not be equipped with the advanced data systems found in newer models, there could still be valuable information available. Did investigators check for a basic engine control module to pull speed and braking data? What about the driver’s cell phone; was it in use at the time of the crash?
And even in smaller communities like La Feria, traffic or surveillance cameras from nearby intersections, businesses or highway systems might offer footage. That video could clarify whether the pedestrian was visible, where the vehicle was positioned and whether the driver took evasive action.
When the facts are thin and the consequences irreversible, the only way to honor what happened is to keep asking deeper questions. These aren’t just details. They’re the difference between a narrative that holds together and one that falls apart under closer scrutiny.
Key Takeaways:
- A late-night crash needs more than just basic photos. It requires full reconstruction and time-sequenced review.
- Older vehicles should always be inspected for problems, even if the crash seems straightforward.
- Every possible piece of digital evidence — black box data, phone records, nearby video — deserves a look when lives are lost.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us