Charlotte, AR — January 3, 2025, Doris Lillard was killed following a car accident that occurred at around 6:14 P.M. on State Highway 25.

An investigation is underway into a car accident that left one person dead during the evening hours of January 3rd. According to official reports, 78-year-old Doris Lillard was walking along the northbound lanes of highway 25 when she was struck by a vehicle.
When first responders arrived on the scene they found that Lillard had sustained serious injuries which she succumbed to. At this time it remains unclear what events transpired leading up to the accident, and thus far there has been no mention of any charges or citations being issued, however this remains an ongoing investigation and more details may be release in the future.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I read about an incident like the one on State Highway 25 involving a pedestrian, my first thought is how essential it is for investigators to uncover all the factors contributing to the crash. Pedestrian accidents, especially those occurring along busy highways, often raise more questions than answers. To fully understand what happened, three key questions must be addressed.
The first question is whether the authorities conducted a thorough investigation. Reports indicate that the pedestrian was walking along the northbound lanes of the highway when they were struck, but this does not fully explain why the collision occurred. Did investigators examine whether the area was properly lit and visible to drivers? Was there a designated walkway or shoulder for pedestrians, and if so, was it accessible and safe? These details, along with witness statements and physical evidence such as tire marks or debris, are crucial for determining the circumstances leading up to the crash.
The second question is whether a vehicle defect could have contributed to the incident. Mechanical issues, such as brake failures or problems with headlights, might have played a role in the driver’s ability to avoid the pedestrian. Additionally, the vehicle’s safety systems should be examined to ensure they were functioning correctly. Preserving the vehicle for a detailed forensic analysis is critical to ruling out—or confirming—any mechanical issues that may have influenced the crash.
The third question is whether all electronic data and other evidence related to the crash have been collected. Many modern vehicles are equipped with electronic control modules (ECMs) that store key data such as speed, braking, and other inputs leading up to a collision. Nearby surveillance cameras, traffic cameras, or dash cameras may have captured the incident, providing valuable insights. Prompt collection and preservation of this evidence is essential to ensure no important detail is overlooked.
Answering these questions is not only about understanding the specifics of this crash but also about identifying any broader safety issues. Highways are often not designed with pedestrians in mind, and incidents like this highlight the importance of evaluating roadway design and pedestrian accessibility to reduce risks in similar situations.
Ultimately, those affected by this incident deserve clear answers about what led to the collision. A thorough investigation is the best way to uncover the full story, address contributing factors, and work toward safer conditions for both pedestrians and drivers.