Hunt County, TX — October 5, 2025, one person was injured in a truck accident at about 3:20 a.m. on Interstate 30 near Hendrix.
A preliminary accident report indicates that a westbound 2019 Freightliner semi-truck rear-ended a 2024 International semi-truck before hitting a 2023 Volkswagen Jetta that was disabled in traffic after an earlier accident. The impact forced the smaller vehicle to overturn.
A passenger in the Volkswagen, a 21-year-old man, was seriously injured in the crash, according to the report. The 22-year-old driver was listed as possibly injured.
Neither truck driver was injured, the report states.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Hunt County crash at this time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When people hear about a crash involving three vehicles, especially when two of them are 18-wheelers, the natural question is: How does something like this even happen? Was one of the trucks following too closely? Was the disabled car visible in the roadway? And most importantly: Was this crash preventable?
From what we know so far, a westbound semi rear-ended another truck, then struck a disabled car that had been involved in a prior wreck. That raises a few critical issues that can’t be ignored.
First, it’s not clear how much time and distance the trailing truck had to avoid the stopped or slowing traffic. Was the second trucker distracted? Was he going too fast for conditions? Or did the disabled car come into view so suddenly that no one had time to react? These aren’t just academic questions. They speak directly to the responsibilities of commercial drivers and the companies that employ them.
To answer those questions, investigators need to look beyond the crash scene. That means getting engine control module data, the black box, to see how fast the truck was going and whether the brakes were applied. If there were in-cab cameras, they might show whether the driver was watching the road or doing something else. Cell phone records could help establish whether the driver was distracted.
It’s also worth asking: Was the disabled car properly lit or moved out of traffic after the earlier accident? If not, that may have contributed to this chain-reaction. But even then, commercial truck drivers are trained, and expected, to anticipate and react to hazards in the roadway. Whether that happened here is still unknown.
And as with many truck crashes, this may not be just about a single moment of inattention. It’s fair to ask what the trucking company knew about the driver’s history, what kind of safety training they provided and how closely they monitored his driving record. I’ve handled cases where trucking companies put someone behind the wheel who had no business driving a big rig, and the results were just as devastating as you’d expect.
Until more facts come out, key details remain unanswered:
- Was the driver of the rear-ending truck distracted or fatigued?
- Were his brakes working properly?
- Did the company have reasonable safety policies in place to prevent this kind of wreck?
- And was the disabled car visible in the lane?
The only way to get real answers is through a thorough investigation that brings together physical evidence, vehicle data and corporate records. That’s the difference between guessing who’s responsible and proving it.
Key Takeaways:
- The main question is whether the rear-ending truck driver had enough time to avoid the collision, or was distracted, speeding or too close to begin with.
- ECM (black box) data, dash cams and phone records will be key to understanding what the truck driver was doing at the time of impact.
- It’s unclear whether the disabled car was properly visible or moved out of traffic, which may be an important factor.
- Investigators should also look at the trucking company’s hiring, training and supervision policies to see if deeper failures contributed.
- Real accountability depends on evidence, not assumptions, and that takes a thorough, independent investigation.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us