Shenandoah County, VA — April 19, 2025, One person was injured following a car accident that occurred at around 3:49 P.M. on I-81.

An investigation is underway following a car accident that left one person injured during the afternoon hours of April 19th. According to official reports, Giorgi Khutsishvili was operating an 18-wheeler on Interstate 81 in the northbound lanes near the 272-mile marker, when the truck suffered a tire blowout, causing the truck to lose control and strike a guardrail before then catching fire near the Middle Creek bridge.
When emergency crews arrived on the scene they found that Khutsishvili had sustained serious injuries and he was transported to the hospital via helicopter. It remains unclear at this time what caused the tire blowout, however as authorities continue to investigate more details may be released in the future.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I hear that a truck crash started with a tire blowout, I immediately start thinking about all the parties who might have had a hand in that tire’s condition—long before it ever hit the road. A lot of people assume tire blowouts are just bad luck, like hitting a pothole at the wrong time. But in my experience, there’s almost always a trail of responsibility that can be uncovered if someone takes the time to look.
First, a professional truck driver has a duty to inspect their vehicle before and during a trip. That includes the tires—checking their pressure, tread depth, and overall condition. If the tire was worn out or underinflated, and no steps were taken to address it, that’s a problem. But driver responsibility is just the starting point.
Companies that operate commercial trucks have obligations too. They’re supposed to ensure that the tires are inspected regularly and replaced when needed. That’s not a suggestion—it’s a legal requirement. If a company tries to cut corners by delaying maintenance or skipping inspections, then that’s not just a safety issue, it’s a liability issue.
And we can’t forget about the possibility of a defect. Sometimes tires fail because they were manufactured improperly or designed in a way that made them unsafe under certain conditions. If that’s the case, then the tire maker could be on the hook. But identifying a defect takes more than just a look at the crash site—it takes a forensic examination of the tire itself, which needs to be preserved and tested by experts.
Another point to consider is whether the tire was recently installed or serviced by a third-party shop. If the tire wasn’t mounted properly or wasn’t suitable for the load it was carrying, the shop that handled it could bear some responsibility. Again, this is something that can’t be confirmed at the crash scene. It requires a paper trail—maintenance logs, invoices, and service contracts—that investigators must track down and analyze.
And then there’s the fire. Anytime a crash results in a fire, especially involving a commercial truck, it raises additional concerns. Was the fuel system compromised in a way that could have been prevented through better design or maintenance? Fires don’t just happen—they’re triggered by something. Investigators need to figure out what that “something” was.
That’s why it’s so important that investigators don’t stop at the tire blowout itself. The key question isn’t just what failed, but why it failed—and who had the responsibility to prevent that failure before the truck ever hit the road. Whether the issue traces back to poor maintenance practices, a manufacturing defect, or a failure by a service provider, none of that gets uncovered by simply documenting the scene. It takes a thorough investigation that looks at maintenance records, equipment history, and expert analysis to make sure no responsible party escapes accountability.