Mesquite, TX — January 28, 2025, Tumendemberel Krakovszki and another person were injured in a cargo van accident at about 12:50 a.m. on Interstate 30.
A preliminary accident report indicates that a westbound 2018 Ram Promaster 3500 van rear-ended a 2020 Hyundai Accent and a 2024 International semi-truck that were stopped in traffic near Big Town Boulevard.
Hyundai driver Tumendemberel Krakovszki, 30, was seriously injured in the crash, according to the report.
The cargo van driver, a 48-year-old Ohio man, suffered serious injuries as well, the report states.
The semi-truck driver was not hurt, according to the report.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Dallas County crash at this time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When people read about a crash like this, the first questions that come to mind are simple: Why were vehicles stopped on the highway at 12:50 in the morning? Did the cargo van driver see them in time? And are we getting the full story about what led up to the impact?
According to early reports, a Ram Promaster cargo van rear-ended both a Hyundai and a semi-truck that were stopped in westbound traffic on Interstate 30 near Big Town Boulevard. The Hyundai driver and the van driver were seriously hurt. The semi-truck driver was not injured.
But that basic outline leaves a lot unanswered.
We don’t yet know why traffic was stopped on the interstate. Was there an earlier crash? Road construction? Congestion that formed suddenly? That matters, because sudden and unexpected stops can create a chain reaction, especially at highway speeds in the dark.
It’s also not clear how long the Hyundai and the semi-truck had been stopped before the van struck them. Were their hazard lights on? Was the semi-truck properly illuminated? Commercial trucks are required to have functioning brake lights and reflective markings, but whether all of that was working is a factual question that needs to be answered with evidence, not assumptions.
As for the cargo van, the key issue is reaction time. Rear-end crashes often come down to whether the following driver was paying attention and maintaining a safe distance. But we don’t yet know what the van driver was doing in the seconds before impact. Was he distracted? Fatigued? Looking at a phone? Only a thorough investigation can answer that.
In a case like this, one of the first steps is to secure electronic data. Many newer commercial vehicles, including vans used for business, have engine control modules that capture speed, throttle position and braking activity in the moments before a crash. That data can show whether the driver attempted to brake, how fast he was traveling and whether there was any evasive action.
Cell phone records can also be critical. If the van driver was using a device at the time of the crash, that would fundamentally change the analysis. But that’s not something anyone should guess about; it has to be verified through records.
The semi-truck also likely has an engine control module, or “black box,” that can confirm whether it was fully stopped, how long it had been stopped and whether its lights were active. If there’s any dispute about whether the truck was moving slowly or completely stopped, that data can resolve it.
Another unanswered question is whether the cargo van was being used for commercial purposes at the time. If it was, that opens the door to questions about employer oversight. Was the driver on a delivery schedule that encouraged rushing? Had he been driving for long hours? What does his driving history look like? In past cases I’ve handled, what looked like a simple rear-end crash turned out to involve deeper issues: poor supervision, unrealistic schedules or a history of unsafe driving that no one addressed.
None of that can be assumed here. But it also shouldn’t be ignored.
Rear-end crashes on highways are often described as “straightforward.” In reality, they rarely are. The difference between an unavoidable collision and a preventable one usually comes down to hard evidence: data downloads, dash cam footage, maintenance records and phone logs.
Until that evidence is collected and analyzed, important questions remain. And those answers are what determine who, if anyone, failed to do their job that night.
Key Takeaways
- We don’t yet know why traffic was stopped on I-30 or how long the vehicles had been sitting there.
- Electronic data from the van and the semi-truck could clarify speed, braking and visibility issues.
- Cell phone records and dash cam footage may be critical to understanding whether distraction played a role.
- If the van was operating commercially, employer policies and driver history could become relevant.
- Determining responsibility depends on evidence, not early assumptions or incomplete reports.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us