Plantation, FL — December 5, 2025, one person was killed and another was injured in a truck accident at about 6:50 a.m. on Florida’s Turnpike.

Authorities said a southbound 2015 Freightliner semi-truck with two FedEx trailers collided with 2012 Mercedes-Benz SUV that was stopped in the center lane near mile marker 55, knocking the smaller vehicle into the median wall.

A 36-year-old Miami woman who was riding in the SUV died in the crash near Interstate 595, according to authorities, while the driver was hospitalized with serious injuries.

The truck driver suffered unspecified injuries, authorities said.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Broward County crash at this time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a crash happens involving a stopped vehicle in the middle of a highway lane, the first thing most people want to know is how that vehicle came to be stopped there in the first place, and whether the truck driver had any realistic opportunity to avoid the collision. Those are the questions that will likely shape any investigation into this fatal truck crash on Florida’s Turnpike.

Authorities say the SUV was stopped in the center lane when a southbound 18-wheeler struck it from behind, pushing it into the median wall. Depending on the specific circumstances, that detail opens up several important questions. Was the SUV disabled due to mechanical failure? Did it stop suddenly because of an earlier incident or obstacle? Were its lights on and visible in the early morning darkness?

From the trucking side, a central concern is whether the driver could, and should, have seen the stopped vehicle in time to brake or maneuver around it. That’s not something that can be guessed at. It takes hard evidence. For instance, what does the truck’s black box (ECM) say about its speed and braking before impact? Was the driver using a phone or distracted by anything inside the cab? If this truck had forward-facing cameras, as many modern fleet vehicles do, that footage would likely tell us a lot about what the driver saw and when.

It’s also not clear whether any secondary factors contributed to the SUV being stopped in the lane. For example, if a prior crash or road hazard led to the vehicle’s position, that could spread responsibility beyond just the truck driver. I’ve seen plenty of cases where an 18-wheeler crashes into something that shouldn’t have been in its path, but also had little warning it was there.

At the same time, professional drivers are held to higher standards for a reason. If a trucker comes upon a clearly visible hazard and still plows into it, that raises questions about their training, their alertness or their employer’s oversight. Was this driver screened properly before being hired? Had they worked excessive hours or violated hours-of-service rules?

I handled a case not long ago where a driver with a troubled employment history was hired by a company that failed to perform a meaningful safety evaluation. After the crash, it came out that their hiring process amounted to a short road test and a few forms; not nearly enough to catch the red flags that any thorough background check would have revealed. In that case, it wasn’t just about what happened in the seconds before impact. It was about the decisions made long before that driver ever got behind the wheel.

Until investigators piece together more of the evidence — dash cams, ECM data, phone records, vehicle inspections — there are still far too many unanswered questions to know exactly what caused this crash or who should be held responsible. But the point of these tools isn’t just to satisfy curiosity. They exist to ensure the right parties are held accountable and to prevent future incidents by addressing the root causes, not just the surface-level facts.


Key Takeaways:

  • A central question is why the SUV was stopped in a live lane of traffic and whether the truck driver had any warning or ability to avoid it.
  • Evidence like ECM data, in-cab cameras and phone records will be key to understanding the trucker’s behavior leading up to the crash.
  • Depending on what caused the SUV to be stopped, responsibility may not rest solely with the truck driver.
  • Trucking company policies around driver hiring, training and oversight often play a hidden but critical role in these incidents.
  • Full accountability requires looking beyond the crash scene to the chain of decisions that led up to it.

Explore cases we take