Lubbock County, TX — January 1, 2026, Lindsey Capers and a child were injured in a pedestrian versus car accident at approximately 3:00 p.m. off of Loop 289.
According to authorities, 29-year-old Lindsey Capers and her two-year-old child were on foot exiting a business near West Loop 289 and 34th Street when the accident took place. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, Capers and the toddler were struck by a motor vehicle that had just made a turn in front of the business the two had just exited.
The toddler reportedly sustained serious injuries due to the collision; they were transported to an area medical facility by EMS in order to receive necessary treatment. Capers suffered injuries of unknown severity, as well, according to reports.
Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a mother and child are struck just outside a business, it’s not enough to chalk it up to a driver’s mistake or a moment of distraction. Crashes like this deserve a closer look at everything that could have contributed—because a two-year-old doesn’t end up critically hurt without multiple things going wrong.
1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Was the vehicle’s turning movement documented precisely? Did investigators examine the line of sight from the business exit, the location of the pedestrians, and the timing of the turn? In pedestrian cases, especially involving children, scene reconstruction should be non-negotiable. That means looking at impact points, analyzing speeds, and checking for witnesses or camera footage. Anything less leaves too much to chance.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
People often assume a driver just wasn’t paying attention, but mechanical failure can also cause a car to surge forward, lose braking power, or fail to detect a pedestrian. A malfunction in the steering, sensors, or even automatic emergency braking system could explain why the driver didn’t stop. If the vehicle wasn’t properly inspected, those possibilities may still be sitting under the hood, unnoticed.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Modern vehicles hold critical clues—how fast the car was going, whether brakes were applied, and whether pedestrian detection systems activated. That information can show exactly what happened in the seconds before impact. Investigators should also secure footage from nearby security cameras, check phone usage records, and gather any dashcam or surveillance video available. That kind of digital evidence can make all the difference when the victims are too young to tell their side.
Crashes like this one shouldn’t be treated like routine accidents. When a child is left seriously injured, the investigation has to be thorough enough to hold up to the weight of what’s been lost.
Takeaways:
- Pedestrian crashes involving children demand full scene reconstruction and evidence review.
- Vehicle defects or system failures could explain why the driver didn’t avoid the collision.
- Data from the car, phones, and cameras may be the only way to fully understand what happened.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us