Goodrich, TX — May 29, 2025, Shelby Hayes and one other person were injured in a car accident at approximately 7:00 p.m. along Farm to Market 1998.
According to authorities, 27-year-old Shelby Hayes was a passenger in an eastbound Ford Expedition at the F.M. 1988 and F.M. 1969 intersection when the accident took place.
Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a northeast bound Mazda occupied by a 64-year-old man failed to yield the right-of-way at the intersection a collision consequently took place between the front-end of the Mazda and the right side of the Expedition.
Both Hayes and the man from the Mazda reportedly suffered serious injuries as a result of the wreck. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a crash sends multiple people to the hospital, it’s a sign that something went seriously wrong—something that can’t be understood by glancing at the wreckage alone. In intersection collisions like this, where yielding decisions are at the center, the investigation has to go deeper than who had the right-of-way on paper.
Was the crash thoroughly investigated?
Crashes at rural intersections often come down to timing and visibility. Investigators should have reconstructed each vehicle’s approach—how fast the Mazda was moving, whether the driver slowed or stopped, and whether the Ford Expedition had time to react. Was the collision broadside or more of a glancing impact? Were there any signs of braking or swerving? These questions require precise measurements, not assumptions. If the scene wasn’t mapped or the vehicle paths weren’t analyzed, the true sequence of events could be left unresolved.
Has anyone looked into possible vehicle defects?
If the Mazda failed to yield, the next question is: why? Could a brake issue, steering problem, or hesitation in the throttle have kept the driver from stopping or accelerating in time? Even an issue with driver-assist features—like collision avoidance or blind-spot monitoring—could have contributed, especially in newer models. On the Expedition’s side, systems like electronic stability control or emergency braking might also need to be reviewed. Mechanical failures may not be common, but they’re not rare enough to ignore—especially in crashes where people end up seriously hurt.
Has all the electronic data been collected?
Both vehicles likely contain event data recorders that log pre-crash metrics—speed, braking, throttle, and steering input. That data could reveal whether the Mazda slowed at all before the intersection, and whether the Expedition’s driver had time to respond. GPS and route data might also clarify positioning and decision-making in the seconds before the crash. These digital records are often the most reliable source for reconstructing exactly what happened, but they’re only useful if someone retrieves them quickly.
A serious crash at a quiet intersection doesn’t explain itself. Real understanding requires effort, evidence, and the willingness to ask hard questions about both vehicles—not just the one that didn’t yield.
- Intersection crashes need full vehicle path analysis to determine timing, speed, and opportunity to react.
- Brake, throttle, or sensor failures may have played a role and must be investigated.
- Electronic data from both vehicles can clarify driver behavior and system performance before the crash.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us