Andrews County, TX — March 22, 2025, one person was injured in a car accident at about 2 a.m. on F.M. 1788 northwest of Midland.

A preliminary accident report indicates that a 2005 Ford Excursion was heading south when it veered off the road and overturned.

1 Injured in Car Accident on F.M. 1788 near Midland, TX

The driver, a 48-year-old man whose name has not been made public yet, was seriously injured in the crash, according to the report.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Andrews County crash.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

Moments like these remind us how quickly things can change. A routine drive becomes a life-altering event in the blink of an eye. In the aftermath of any serious accident, particularly when only one vehicle is involved, the challenge is often figuring out what caused the vehicle to go off-course in the first place. That’s where tough questions come in, questions that don’t just skim the surface.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? When a vehicle leaves the roadway and overturns, especially late at night, it’s easy for investigators to lean on assumptions like fatigue, distraction or misjudgment. But that’s not the same as a thorough investigation. Did the team laser-map the scene? Was the vehicle’s path reconstructed to pinpoint when and how it left the road? Did anyone look into the driver’s activities leading up to the crash? In smaller counties or rural areas, crash reconstruction units may be stretched thin or called in only for fatalities, which risks leaving key questions unanswered.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? A 2005 Ford Excursion is an older vehicle, and age can mean increased chances of mechanical failure. Brakes can degrade, steering systems can seize and worn tires can blow unexpectedly. Unless someone gets under the hood and inspects the vehicle’s components, there’s no way to know if the crash stemmed from a physical failure instead of a human one. Skipping that step just leaves a major gap in understanding what really happened.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Even an older model like a 2005 Excursion might hold usable electronic clues. Did it record any diagnostic trouble codes before the crash? Was a phone in use? Is there GPS data showing speed or route history? And what about any nearby surveillance or traffic cameras that might have caught the moment it veered off? Without combing through every available digital footprint, investigators may miss the full story.

As straightforward as a single-vehicle crash might look at first glance, that surface simplicity can be misleading. Real answers require digging: into the mechanics, the data and the timeline. Otherwise, the “why” behind the wreck stays out of reach.

Key Takeaways:

  • Not all crash scenes get the in-depth analysis they deserve.
  • Mechanical issues can lurk beneath the surface in older vehicles.
  • Digital clues often tell parts of the story people can’t.

Table of Contents