Dewitt County, TX — August 18, 2025, Matthew Hamman was injured as the result of a car accident at around 4:44 p.m. on FM 682.
Initial details about the accident say that it happened off the corner of FM 682 and FM 3010 south of Yoakum.

According to officials, 50-year-old Matthew Hamman was in a Ford F-150 going northbound along the roadway while a GMC Sierra was going southbound. The vehicles reportedly crossed paths, resulting in a collision.
Due to the accident, Matthew Hamman reportedly had serious injuries. The other driver had no reported injuries. At this time, additional details are unavailable.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When two vehicles collide on a rural road, and only one driver is seriously hurt, the early reports often raise more questions than they answer. It’s important for there to be certainty that all sides of the story are being considered fairly. A few key questions early on can help in that regard.
1. Did the authorities have the time, equipment, and training to fully investigate the crash?
Crashes on narrow rural roads can be more complex than they seem. Understanding how the vehicles crossed paths requires a close look at lane position, impact angles, and possible evasive action. That kind of work takes time and the right tools—resources that may not always be available during a standard response.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
If either vehicle drifted unexpectedly or didn’t respond properly, it’s possible that a mechanical issue played a role. Steering problems, brake failure, or electronic malfunctions won’t necessarily leave obvious evidence at the scene. Only a detailed inspection can rule that out.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Modern vehicles often store key data—speed, braking, and steering input—right before a crash. That information, along with phone activity or GPS history, can help confirm what each driver was doing at the time. But this kind of data is time-sensitive and may already be lost if no one preserved it.
In my experience, if authorities can clearly answer these questions, it’s usually a sign they’re being thorough in their investigations. But when their answers come up short, that can be a sign that the crash would be better off in the hands of independent investigators.
Takeaways:
- It’s not clear whether the crash was reconstructed using the proper tools and training.
- A mechanical failure in either truck could explain the collision but would require inspection to verify.
- Electronic data may clarify what happened—if it was retrieved in time.