result image We’re ranked the BEST for one simple reason. We treat our clients fairly, because we CARE.
result image

Recent Results

$5,545,000.00 Wrongful Death / Truck Accident Attorney Fees: $2,180,000 Litigation Expenses: $100,000
result image

Recent Results

$2,500,000.00 Wrongful Death / Workplace Accident Attorney Fees: $833,333 Litigation Expenses: $166,667
result image

Recent Results

$7,500,000.00 Wrongful Death / Truck Accident Attorney Fees: $3,000,000 Litigation Expenses: $320,000
result imageresult image
Michael Headshot

How Comparative Negligence Works

In this article in our series on proportionate responsibility, we’re going to examine how comparative negligence works. Proportionate responsibility is ultimately about how courts address cases where the plaintiff himself is found to have actually contributed to the incident.

In states where proportionate responsibility is awarded based on comparative negligence, if the defendant is found to be even one perfect at fault, the case will continue forward. In this article, we will discuss comparative negligence and how it can affect your case.


Questions answered on this page:

  • What is comparative negligence?
  • How does comparative negligence work?
  • What are the potential issues with comparative negligence, and how could it affect my case?
  • How can a lawyer help me in a case that is decided based on contributory negligence?


Don’t leave until you’ve checked out our popular Comprehensive Guide to Personal Injury Law to get a full rundown on this area of jurisprudence.

How comparative negligence works in personal injury cases.

In some states where contributory-negligence is used for determining fault, if an accident victim had even 1% of fault for the incident, a judge will kick the case out of court entirely. However, in states that have comparative negligence, the court allows jury to assign fault to the plaintiffs. Even, if the plaintiff is found to be 99% responsible, they are still able to recover proportionally from the defendant. These states, which include California, Florida, and New York, only bar a plaintiff from recovering any money if he’s totally and completely at fault for the accident.

However, in states like Texas, a court will proportionally reduce a plaintiff’s award up until the jury finds the plaintiff contributed 51% to the accident, after which the plaintiff’s case must be dismissed.

The ideas behind comparative negligence.

The states that apply this doctrine follow the principle that people who get hurt still have the right to hold wrongdoers responsible even though they themselves helped cause a majority of their injuries. In part, this is to encourage folks who might otherwise be scared to file claims to pursue them anyhow. Further, there’s simple justice at issue: someone caused a percentage of fault for the accident, and they shouldn’t be able to walk away scot-free just because the plaintiff contributed to his or her accident.

Again, Texas doesn’t apply comparative negligence. We believe that this is the most just system, but the Texas Legislature adopted the modified comparative fault approach at the behest of business lobbyists.

Hurt or lost a loved one? Put our 25 years of experience to work for you.

Regardless of what happened, we’re here to help get you the justice you deserve. Don’t let the defendants and their big insurance companies win. Call us at (855) 326-0000 now.


For Further Reading About Personal Injury Law

Do you have a legal question? Enter your phone number in the boxes below and we will call you immediately.
- -
Call us anytime toll Free 1-855-326-0000
Attorney Michael Grossman is here to help. Get In Touch. Attorney Michael Grossman is here to help. I'm here to help.
Do you have a legal question? Enter your phone number in the boxes below and we will call you immediately.
- -
Call us anytime toll Free 1-855-326-0000