I delivered a load of hay and a couple of bales got pushed down on top of me. They were very patient with me, worked with me, they filled me in on details, they stayed in communication, and they let me know what was going on. The atmosphere of the people was very friendly, very likeable, VERY LIKEABLE, and no pressure. Mike was exquisitely very, very nice, very friendly. They looked out for my interests.
-
H. Lindquist
Workplace Accident Case
Dallas Workmans Compensation Lawyers
Were You Injured While on the Job? We Can Answer Your Questions
Being hurt in a workplace accident can be an expensive and traumatizing experience, and many work accident victims wish to seek compensation through a lawsuit. However, they probably have a number of questions as well: how did this jobsite accident happen? Who is responsible? Can I file a work injury lawsuit? What is workers’ compensation, and how will it change my lawsuit?
Put simply, jobsite injury cases are some of the most complex, technical cases in the entire legal world, and without the help of a team of experienced workmans compensation lawyers, you will have almost no chance of success. Many workers (and a fair number of work injury law firms) do not understand how workers’ compensation and work injury cases in general work, and so these victims and inexperienced law firms get taken advantage of by unscrupulous employers who refuse to take responsibility for their workers’ injuries.
The experienced Dallas workmans compensation lawyers from Grossman Law Offices are here to help you understand what you are up against in a work injury case, and how we can help you overcome it. Workmans compensation lawyer Michael Grossman has years of experience with these types of cases, and a working knowledge of workers’ compensation issues. He can help you seek the compensation you deserve, no matter what type of situation you are in. Though work injury cases are complex, very few victims are without options. You just need an experienced team of legal professionals to help you identify and pursue those options.
What Exactly is Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Why Does it Make my Case so Complex?
Technically, workers’ compensation is a form of insurance. However, you should not make the mistake of assuming that it is exactly like a standard insurance policy. Workers’ compensation insurance is part of bureaucratic legislation designed to make employers effectively immune to lawsuits filed by their employees. If a worker is hurt on the job and that worker’s employer subscribes to workers’ compensation insurance, the injured worker cannot file a lawsuit against his or her employer. Note that this does not mean that the worker cannot seek compensation. The worker simply must consider other alternatives, such as third party claims.
Third party claims are common in construction sites. For instance, if a worker trips over some sort of debris and injuries himself, the contractor responsible for cleaning the job site might be a liable third party. Or if you are driving a company vehicle and you are in an auto accident, you might could file a third party claim against the other driver in the accident. Third party claims are not contingent on workers’ compensation payments or work injury lawsuits filed against your employer, meaning you can file a third party claim regardless of any other claims or lawsuits filed against any other party.
You should also note that subscribing to workers’ compensation insurance is voluntary. Employers who have the insurance are called subscribers, while employers who do not are called non-subscribers. Furthermore, many employers do not play by the rules when their workers are hurt. Our firm has seen many cases where an employer claimed to have workers’ compensation insurance, but our firm investigated the employer more fully and realized that he or she was lying in order to avoid liability. So even if your employer claims to have workers’ compensation insurance, you should let our Dallas workmans compensation lawyers investigate your case. Your employer might not be telling the truth. Even if he or she does have workers’ compensation insurance, we may be able to help you pursue a third party claim and secure the compensation you need.
What Sort of Payments Will I Receive if my Employer has Workers’ Compensation Insurance?
Workers’ compensation does have one benefit to employees: it is a no-fault insurance, which means that, if you are injured while working for an employer who subscribes to workers’ compensation insurance, you will receive payments in virtually all cases. It does not matter who was at fault. Unfortunately, the payments you receive will probably not be enough to cover the true cost of an injury. Workers’ compensation payments cover your medical bills, a potential lump sum payment at the end of your treatment (this payment is typically miniscule), and compensation for your lost wages. However, lost wage payments are capped at 70% of your income or $600 per week, whichever is lower. This means that, if you were a carpenter who previously made $70,000 per year, but you suffered a severe injury on the job and lost your hand, you probably would not ever be able to return to work. Therefore, you would receive compensation for the rest of your life from workers’ compensation payments. However, these payments would not exceed $600 per week, whereas you previously made $1400 per week.
Unfortunately, these payments cannot be negotiated. Despite popular parlance, there is no workers’ compensation lawsuit. This is why it is imperative that you let our experienced attorneys investigate your case, determine whether or not your employer truly subscribes to workers’ compensation insurance, and identify any liable third parties in your accident. We are dedicated to making sure you receive the compensation you deserve, even if your employer is protected from lawsuits.
How Does a Lawsuit Filed Against a Non-Subscriber Work?
Workers’ compensation protects employers who subscribe to it, but it also leaves vulnerable those employers who choose not to. If you are hurt while working for a non-subscriber, you can file a work injury lawsuit and seek compensation for all your damages, including:
- Medical bills, both past and future
- Property damage
- Lost income from time spent in the hospital
- Lost earning potential due to long-term disability or injury
- Physical pain and suffering
- Mental and emotional suffering caused by your injuries/disfigurement/disability/etc.
The amount of money you can receive from a successful work injury lawsuit is not limited like the payments provided by workers’ compensation insurance.
Unfortunately, you will likely be up against aggressive defense lawyers and insurance companies. If your employer does not subscribe to workers’ compensation insurance, then his or her only legal defense is to prove that you were 100% responsible for your injuries. This means that his or her lawyers will be working around the clock to build a case against you. Non-subscribers hire experienced defense lawyers who focus solely on protecting non-subscribers in work injury lawsuits. These lawyers have hundreds of cases under their belt, and you need an experienced and aggressive work injury attorney to fight back.
One way defense lawyers might claim that you are responsible for your injuries is by pointing out that you were working alone at the time of your accident. This is one of the most common defense techniques, and many injured workers do not know how to respond to it. For example, let us say that you suffered a severe back injury while lifting a heavy object at a warehouse. Your employer’s defense attorneys might argue that, since you were working all on your own, that you must be liable for your injuries. However, our attorneys know how to link your injuries back to various forms of employer negligence. For instance, did your employer provide you with another worker to help lift the objects? Did your employer train you on how to lift heavy objects? Did your employer provide you with safety equipment or machinery to assist in the heavy lifting? These are the types of questions that can link your injuries to employer negligence. Our attorneys can identify extremely obscure forms of liability to ensure that your employer takes responsibility for your injuries, no matter how many defense lawyers he throws at us.
I am a Contract Worker. Can I Still File a Work Injury Lawsuit?
Ostensibly, Texas law would seem to indicate that only general employees (i.e. not contractors) can file work injury lawsuits. This is not accurate. However, many employers see this as the perfect loophole. They choose not to subscribe to workers’ compensation insurance, and then they hire almost exclusively contractors, they make all their workers sign a contract that says, “I am a contractor,” and they think they have beaten the system.
But this is not the case, and our experienced workmans compensation attorneys can help you established an employer-employee relationship even if you signed on as a contractor. From a legal standpoint, your relationship with your employer is determined by a number of different aspects of your actual working relationship. These precedents override any contract you might have signed, and can allow you to take legal action against your employer.
Unfortunately for injured contractors, many work injury law firms are not familiar with this process. Our firm recently handled a case where a man was injured on the job, and seven different law firms told the man that he could not file a lawsuit because he was hired by a contracting company. However, our firm was able to identify and prove an employer-employee relationship. We were ultimately able to secure a seven figure settlement for this injured worker.
Proving an Employer-Employee Relationship
The most straightforward way to prove this relationship is to have a contract that establishes it. Another relatively straightforward case is if a worker is performing services that are particular to the employer’s business. For example, if you are at Starbucks, wearing a Starbucks shirt, serving people Starbucks coffee, then you are a Starbucks employee, regardless of any contracts (or lack thereof).
In less straightforward cases, our lawyers turn to a number of different factors that can prove that an employer-employee relationship exists. For non-borrowed workers, the following conditions ultimately determine your relationship with your employer:
- The worker performs his or her job independently: if an electrician works for a phone company, that electrician is an employee. If he or she workers for many different clients, he or she is a contractor.
- The worker provides his or her own tools and equipment: if the worker brings his or her own tools and equipment to the job site, he or she is a contractor. If the worker’s tools and equipment are provided by the employer, the worker is an employee.
- The worker’s employer does not inspect the worker’s product until it is complete: if the worker’s employer manages the project and inspects the work at various stages of completion, the worker is an employee. If the employer only examines the finished product, the worker is a contractor.
- The employer dictates how much time is spent on each project: if the employer determines how much time the worker must invest in a particular project, the worker is an employee. If the worker completes each project at his or her own pace, the worker is a contractor.
- The worker’s pay is based on completion of a project: if the worker is paid by the hour or on a yearly salary, the worker is an employee. If the worker is paid based on the completion of a project, the worker is a contractor.
When employers borrow workers from other agencies, the rules are similar, but there are some important differences. The rules governing borrowed workers include:
- The borrowing employer has the right to hire or fire: if the borrowing employer is allowed to hire or fire the worker at any time, regardless of the lending agencies decision, the worker is an employee.
- The borrowing employer was allowed to selected a specific worker: if the employer selected the worker specifically for any reason, the worker is an employee. If the lending agency sent whatever worker they wanted, the worker is a contractor.
- The borrowed worker provides his or her own tools: if the borrowed worker brings his or her own tools or equipment to the job site, the worker is a contractor. If the borrowing employer provides the tools, the worker is an employee.
- The lending agency may substitute one worker for another at any time: if the lending agency can exchange the borrowed worker for another without the employer’s approval, the worker is a contractor. If the lending agency does not have this right, the worker is an employee.
- The borrowed worker is borrowed for an unspecific length of time: if the borrowing employer is borrowing the worker for an undetermined amount of time, the worker is an employee. If the length of employment is pre-determined, the worker is a contractor.
- The borrowed worker has a specific skill set that the employer needs: if a boat manufacturer borrows a composite materials specialist from a surfboard manufacturer, the worker is a contractor. If the employer borrows a worker to do a job that virtually anyone could do, the worker is an employee.
- The borrowing employer assumes responsibility for the worker’s income tax and social security: if the borrowing employer is responsible for paying the worker’s income tax and social security, the worker is an employee. If the employer does not take responsibility for these expenses, the worker is a contractor.
Let Grossman Law Offices Help You Build a Strong Case
Work injury lawsuits are complex, as you can see. If this is too much to take in, remember these points:
- Our Dallas workmans comp lawyers can help you build a strong case against a non-subscriber
- We can investigate your employer and determine whether or not he or she truly has workers’ compensation insurance
- We can help you identify and take legal action against liable third parties so that you receive all the compensation you deserve
- We can help you establish an employer-employee relationship, even if you signed on as a contractor
- We can fight aggressively against defense attorneys
If you are hurt on the job, it is imperative that you do not talk to your employer, his or her insurance adjusters, or any defense lawyers. Do not sign anything and do not accept any payments. Let our experienced attorneys handle these negotiations to ensure that you do not inadvertently damage your case. Michael Grossman from Grossman Law Offices has been investigating, litigating, and resolving work injury claims for twenty years, and our firm has extensive experience with every type of work injury case you can imagine. No matter how complex your case is, our attorneys can help you seek the compensation you deserve from many different sources. We are dedicated to building a comprehensive work injury lawsuit that brings claims against every liable party, no matter how they try to hide or obscure their liability.
Furthermore, we have successfully brought cases against every major insurance carrier and defense attorney firm in the nation. When these people learn that we are representing a client, they often offer that client a sizable settlement because they know how successful our attorneys have been, and they do not want to face us in court. In other words, we can help you get back on your feet as quickly as possible. If you have been injured on the job, do not let those responsible for your suffering go unpunished. Contact the experienced Dallas workmans compensation lawyers from Grossman Law Offices today, and let our team of legal professionals ensure that you receive fair compensation and the justice you deserve.
What is workers' compensation?
Can I file a lawsuit?
A loading dock employee suffered a fractured and damage to internal organs as the result of a crushing injury sustained when an 18-wheeler backed into him and crushed him between the trailer and loading dock.
$700,000.00
$175,000.00
$1,084.00
Recovered for worker who injured their shoulder while lifting a heavy object.
$162,500.00
$81,250.00
$3,784.00
A loading dock worker suffered serious including numerous facial fractures and minor brain trauma when an 18-wheeler back into him, crushing him against the loading dock. The plaintiff's employer was a subscriber to Texas Workers' Compensation coverage, thus a claim was rightly filed against the third party trucking company whom the truck driver operating the reversing 18-wheeler worked for.
The plaintiffs asserted the position that the trucking company in question was liable on the basis of respondeat superior and negligent retention. The defendants argued that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries by virtue of the plaintiff putting himself in harms way. They maintained that the plaintiff simply walked behind the reversing tractor trailer as it pushed back toward the loading dock.
It was later determined through deposition testimony that the truck driver had indeed instructed the plaintiff to stand behind the trailer in order to determine the vehicle's proximity to the dock. Once this fact came to light, the defendants agreed to mediate whereby the case was satisfactorily settled.
$300,000.00
$120,000.00
$9,807.00
Our firm was hired by a delivery driver who suffered a closed head injury resulting in the permanent loss of smell in a head-on accident. The incident occurred as the driver of an 18-wheeler lost control of his vehicle and veered into oncoming traffic. Our client's delivery vehicle was struck head-on, causing massive damage to both vehicles.
Our client was taken to an area hospital where he was treated for minor bodily injuries and a closed head injury which originally manifested itself as a concussion and temporary memory loss.
Suit was filed against the defendants following their failure to respond to our correspondence in a timely manner and litigation began. Included in the suit were both the defendant truck driver and his employer. The results of our investigation and the physical evidence from the accident scene made it apparent that the defendants had indeed caused the accident. Defense counsel soon conceded liability
$1,450,000.00
$560,000.00
$31,410.00
Our attorneys were hired by a delivery driver who sustained a serious shoulder injury when a worker for a third party negligently operated a fork lift. The accident occurred as the plaintiff delivered a load of hay bails to a commercial farm.
An employee of said facility attempted to unload the trailer with a forklift. In doing so, he pushed several bales of hay off of the flatbed, over the side opposite the forklift. Consequently, several of the 400 lb (est.) bales of hay struck the plaintiff who was working to disconnect tie downs on the opposite side of the trailer. This resulted in serious injury to the plaintiff's shoulder.
The defendants took an aggressive stance and denied the claim, asserting that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his own injuries by virtue of the fact that he was standing in a known dangerous area. Suit was filed soon thereafter. Our attorneys argued that the plaintiff's ordinary work duties, and indeed the normal protocol for all flatbed delivery drivers, consists of letting loose the materials to be unloaded. We maintained that the true cause of the plaintiff's injuries was that the forklift operator rushed into unloading the trailer.
Furthermore, the manner in which he unloaded the trailer was itself a contributing element of the defendant's negligence. The forks that were incorporated into the forklift in question were not compatible with stabbing hay bails; they were ordinary forks that were designed to be positioned below a heavy object that was to be lifted. The case was successfully resolved in mediation.
$226,000.00
$84,000.00
$5,500.00
(policy limits) Our attorneys secured a recovery against a major trucking company for the daughter of a man who was killed after his vehicle collided into an 18-wheeler which was blocking the roadway. Litigation is ongoing against additional defendants.
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
A young worker was negligently trained to operate a piece of machinery. During a routine cleaning procedure, he suffered a serious hand injury consisting of numerous deep lacerations across his palm. The defendants claimed that he was a contract laborer and therefore owed no legal duty. Through litigation, our attorneys showed evidence to establish an employer-employee relationship thereby creating a non-subscriber work injury cause of action.
$1,010,000.00
$333,300.00
$50,000.00
The mother of a young man hired our firm to investigate the death of her son following a fatal car accident. The incident occurred as one of the two vehicles involved ran a red light and drive into the path of the other. The defendant was driving a work vehicle for a construction company. The defendant survived the accident and stated to police that the decedent caused the accident. The police could not conclusively determine who was at fault, yet the police report strongly implied that the decedent was likely at fault based on the statement provided by the defendant.
The plaintiff's mother was not convinced. Through a thorough investigation, we ultimately determined that the stoplight that the defendant claimed that our client ran, in fact, worked on a timer whereby the light was always green between certain hours unless a vehicle traveling on the intersecting road had been stopped at the right light for more than 30 seconds. Based on an analysis of the vehicles and tire markings, it was conclusively determined that both vehicles were traveling at the speed limit, which clearly indicates that the defendant driver had not accelerated from stop, rather, he was traveling at the speed limit, which would not have triggered a green light for the defendant.
The logical implications of this information is that the light could not have been red for the plaintiff, and it certainly would have been red for the defendant. As a consequence of this information, the case was resolved through litigation.
$335,000.00
$134,000.00
$63,000.00
Recovery for worker who suffered soft tissue injuries when his fork lift was struck by a delivery truck.
$75,000.00
$25,000.00
$350.00
(policy limits) Recovery of a disputed life insurance policy for the family of a contractor who died on the job.
$150,000.00
$50,000.00
$341.00








